Abstract
Objective : to evaluate the effects of conservative treatment in women with urinary incontinence by HTLV. Method : The Joanna Briggs Institute methodology was used. Inclusion criteria: conservative, non-invasive and non-drug treatments for urinary incontinence in adult women with HTLV and their respective synonyms, associated with the Boolean AND and OR descriptors, in Portuguese, English and Spanish languages, without time limitation. The search and evaluation will be carried out by two independent researchers, from the databases: LILACS and SciELO, Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed ,Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL and in the Cochrane Library database. The evaluation of quality and risk of bias will be through evaluation instruments, to be chosen according to the methodology of the studies. Results: they will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Described in narrative, imagery and tabular form. Conclusion: it will address important findings and implications for the scientific environment.
References
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Departamento de Doenças de Condições Crônicas e Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis. Guia de manejo clínico da infecção pelo HTLV [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2021 [cited 2023 Mar 03]. Available from: https://www.gov.br/aids/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/publicacoes/2022/guia_htlv_internet_24-11-21-2_3.pdf/view
Bahia. Secretaria de Saúde. Boletim Epidemiológico HTLV [Internet]. Bahia: Secretaria Municipal de Saúde; 2021 [cited 2023 Mar 03]. Available from: http://www.saude.ba.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/BoletimHTLV_No01_-2021.pdf
Nozuma S, Jacobson S. Neuroimmunology of Human T-Lymphotropic Virus Type 1-Associated Myelopathy/Tropical Spastic Paraparesis. Front. Microbiol. 2019; 10:885. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00885
Haziot ME, Gascon MR, Assone T, Fonseca LAM, Luiz OC, Smid J, et al. Detection of clinical and neurological signs in apparently asymptomatic HTLV-1 infected carriers: Association with high proviral load. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(5):e0006967. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006967
Truzzi JC, Almeida FG, Sacomani CA, Reis J, Rocha FET. Neurogenic bladder–concepts and treatment recommendations. International Braz J Urol. 2021;48(2):220-243. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0098
Todhunter-Brown A, Hazelton C, Campbell P, Elders A, Hagen S, Mcclurg D. Conservative interventions for treating urinary incontinence in women: an Overview of Cochrane systematic reviews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2022, Issue 9. Art. No: CD012337. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012337.pub2
Joanna Briggs Institute. JBI’s Critical appraisal tool assist in assessing the trustworthiness, relevance and results of published papers [Internet]. PROSPERO;2022 [cited 2021 Jul 29]. Available from: https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools
Paranhos RB, Amaral JB, David RAR. Conservative treatment of urinary incontinence in Women with T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1: systematic review. PROSPERO [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Mar 29]. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023307183
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP recommends using the Harvard style, i.e. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP (insert name of checklist i.e. Randomised Controlled Trial) Checklist [Internet]. CASP;2020 [cited 2021 Jul 29]. Available from: https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/
Sterne ACJ, Hernán MA, McAleenan A, Reeves BC, Higgins JPT. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 6.3, 2022. [cited 2021 Jul 29]. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-25
Panda S, Begley C, Daly D. Clinicians’ views of factors influencing decision-making for caesarean section: A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies. PLoS One. 2018;13(7):e0200941. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200941
MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ; 2021 [cited 2023 Mar 29]. Available from: http://www.prisma-statement.org/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Array