Computational rules for the nursing process in oncology palliative care: a technological innovation report
PDF (Portuguese)
PDF
PDF (Spanish)
EPUB (Portuguese)
EPUB
EPUB (Spanish)
HTML (Portuguese)
HTML
HTML (Spanish)

Keywords

Nursing Process
Palliative Care
Nursing Informatics
Clinical Decision Support Systems
Biomedical Technology
Health Information Systems

How to Cite

1.
de Azeredo Siqueira AS, Gomes da Silva V, Nencetti Pereira Rocha RC, de Paula Albuquerque Guimarães N, David da Silva E, Coe Camargo da Silva Ângela. Computational rules for the nursing process in oncology palliative care: a technological innovation report. Online Braz J Nurs [Internet]. 2026 Oct. 3 [cited 2026 Oct. 3];25(Suppl1):e20267082. Available from: https://objnursing.uff.br/nursing/article/view/7082

Abstract

Objective: To describe the development, architecture, and construction of the knowledge base of a computational rule-based system for decision support in the Nursing Process in Oncology Palliative Care. Method: A technological innovation report guided by the SQUIRE 2.0 framework, concerning the iterative and participatory development of the PaliPEV platform in a low-code environment (AppSheet®/Google Sheets®). The knowledge base was developed by the Nursing Process Committee across 11 technical-scientific meetings, grounded in Horta's and Kolcaba's theories and a master's thesis. Thirty-one NANDA-I diagnoses were defined and aligned with NOC outcomes, NIC interventions, and nursing prescriptions, alongside the use of the Braden, Morse, and Karnofsky scales and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System. The study was approved by a Research Ethics Committee. Results: Following an audit, 36,448 valid Nursing Processes distributed across 3,193 medical records (registrations) were identified, featuring 71,969 automatic associations and NANDA-I taxonomy completeness exceeding 99.7% across the three evaluated scenarios. The strategy was complemented by the PaliEducativa platform (35,876 accesses; 2,280 certificates issued), enabling the institution to achieve Gold Certification in a Nursing Process quality program. Conclusion: Grounded in theoretical foundations and empirical data, the iterative development proved feasible for decision support in the Nursing Process in Oncology Palliative Care, demonstrating potential for machine learning application.

PDF (Portuguese)
PDF
PDF (Spanish)
EPUB (Portuguese)
EPUB
EPUB (Spanish)
HTML (Portuguese)
HTML
HTML (Spanish)

References

Horta WA. Processo de enfermagem. São Paulo: EPU; 1979.

Herdman TH, Kamitsuru S, Lopes CT, organizers. NANDA International nursing diagnoses: definitions and classification 2024-2026. 13th ed. New York: Thieme; 2024.

Conselho Federal de Enfermagem (BR). Resolução Cofen nº 736, de 17 de janeiro de 2024. Dispõe sobre a implementação do Processo de Enfermagem em todo contexto socioambiental onde ocorre o cuidado de enfermagem. Brasília (DF): Cofen; 2024 [cited 2026 Jun 29]. Available from: https://www.cofen.gov.br/resolucao-cofen-no-736-de-17-de-janeiro-de-2024/

Lee RY, Knaplund C, Withall J, Bokhari SM, Cato KD, Rossetti SC. Variability in Nursing Documentation Patterns across Patients' Hospital Stays. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2024;2023:1037-1046. PMID: 38222368; PMCID: PMC10785899.

Khalil CA, Saab A, Rahme J, Bouaud J, Seroussi B. Capabilities of computerized decision support systems supporting the nursing process in hospital settings: a scoping review. BMC Nurs. 2025;24:677. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03272-w. PMID: 40598308.

Rafner J, Dellermann D, Hjorth A, Verasztó D, Kampf CE, Mackay WE, et al. Deskilling, upskilling, and reskilling: a case for hybrid intelligence. Morals Mach. 2021;1(2):24-39. https://doi.org/10.5771/2747-5174-2021-2-24

Schlicht L, Wendsche J, Melzer M, Tschetsche L, Rösler U. Digital technologies in nursing: an umbrella review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2025;161:104950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104950. PMID: 39603090.

Walzer S, Armbruster C, Mahler S, Farin-Glattacker E, Kunze C. Factors Influencing the Implementation and Adoption of Digital Nursing Technologies: Systematic Umbrella Review. J Med Internet Res. 2025;27:e64616. https://doi.org/10.2196/64616. PMID: 40743516.

Zhao Y, Hu J, Gu Y, Wan Y, Liu F, Ye C, Zhang X. Development and implementation of a pediatric nursing-clinical decision support system for hyperthermia: a pre- and post-test. CIN Comput Inform Nurs. 2021;40(2):131-137. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000812. PMID: 34347639.

Ho KF, Chou PH, Chao JCJ, Hsu CY, Chung MH. Design and evaluation of a knowledge-based clinical decision support system for the psychiatric nursing process. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021;207:106128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106128. PMID: 34015737.

Lu SC, Brown RJ, Michalowski M. A Clinical Decision Support System Design Framework for Nursing Practice. ACI Open. 2021;5(2):e84-e93. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1736470

Guo J, Dai Y, Chen F, Liu C, Jiang S, Hu Y, et al. Role of Digital Health on Palliative Care: Umbrella Review. J Med Internet Res. 2025;27:e72104. https://doi.org/10.2196/72104. PMID: 41151049.

Zhang Y, Zhou C, Xing Y, Liu Y, Sun J, Luan W. Application of digital technology intervention in palliative care: a scoping review. BMC Palliat Care. 2025;24:31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-025-01963-4. PMID: 41345868.

Tan YH, Xue L, Wei M, HuiMin X, Yang W, Yan G. A scoping review of digital technology applications in palliative care. BMC Palliat Care. 2024;23:290. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01626-w. PMID: 39707313.

Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D, Batalden P, Davidoff F, Stevens D. SQUIRE 2.0: revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(12):986-92. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411. PMID: 26369893.

Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Science of Improvement: Establishing Measures [Internet]. Boston (MA): Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2023 [cited 2026 Jun 29]. Available from: https://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/HowtoImprove/ScienceofImprovementEstablishingMeasures.aspx

Peffers K, Tuunanen T, Rothenberger MA, Chatterjee S. A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. J Manag Inf Syst. 2007;24(3):45-77. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302

Guimarães NPA. Avaliação inicial de enfermagem do paciente com câncer avançado: uma produção em prol dos princípios dos cuidados paliativos [dissertation]. Rio de Janeiro: Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; 2024.

Google LLC. AppSheet: build apps with no code [Internet]. Mountain View (CA): Google LLC; 2026 [cited 2026 Aug 18]. Available from: https://about.appsheet.com/home/

Kolcaba K. Comfort theory and practice: a vision for holistic health care and research. New York: Springer Publishing; 2003.

Moorhead S, Swanson E, Johnson M, Maas ML, eds. Classificação dos Resultados de Enfermagem (NOC). 7. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; 2023.

Wagner CM, Butcher HK, Clarke MF, eds. Classificação das Intervenções de Enfermagem (NIC). 8. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; 2024.

Johnson M, Moorhead S, Bulechek G, Butcher H, Maas M, Swanson E. NOC and NIC linkages to NANDA-I and clinical conditions. 3rd ed. Maryland Heights: Mosby/Elsevier; 2012.

Bergstrom N, Braden BJ, Laguzza A, Holman V. The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk. Nurs Res. 1987;36(4):205-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198707000-00002

Guo Y, Pattavana F, Siangco C, Ngo-Huang A, Fu J, Hui D, et al. Overall Survival among Patients with Cancer and Pressure Injury and Its Association with Braden Scale Score. J Palliat Med. 2022;25(8):1254-7. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2021.0645. PMID: 35394852.

Morse JM, Morse RM, Tylko SJ. Development of a scale to identify the fall-prone patient. Can J Aging. 1989;8(4):366-77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980800008576

Jiang H, Liu H, Wu H, Yang Y, Li X. A real-world study on the Morse Fall Scale and clinical judgment method for fall risk in adult inpatients. Int Nurs Rev. 2025;72(4):e70110. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.70110. PMID: 41084899.

Karnofsky DA, Burchenal JH. The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: MacLeod CM, editor. Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents. New York: Columbia University Press; 1949. p. 191-205.

Ferreira PCS, Moreira MN, Lourenço RA. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Karnofsky Performance Status instrument to Brazilian Portuguese. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2024;51:e20243771. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20243771-en. PMID: 39630756.

Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ, Selmser P, Macmillan K. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care. 1991;7(2):6-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/082585979100700202

Alsuliman HR, Alsaigh SA, Habib FA, Alshehery MZ. Exploring the Influence of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Implementation in Palliative Care Patients: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2024;16(10):e70914. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.70914. PMID: 39502990.

Shala DR, Jones A, Fairbrother G, Tran DT. Completion of electronic nursing documentation of inpatient admission assessment: insights from Australian metropolitan hospitals. Int J Med Inform. 2021;156:104614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104614. PMID: 34662820.

Conselho Regional de Enfermagem do Rio de Janeiro. Programa de Apoio à Implantação do Processo de Enfermagem no Estado do Rio de Janeiro (PRO_SAE_PE) [Internet]. Rio de Janeiro: Coren-RJ; 2026 [cited 2026 Jun 29]. Available from: https://www.coren-rj.org.br/pro-sae-pe/

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing