Resumo
Objetivo: avaliar os ensaios clínicos randomizados existentes na literatura sobre os efeitos da terapia assistida com animais no manejo da dor, em pessoas com quadros álgicos, comparando-a ao tratamento convencional ou a outras intervenções não farmacológicas. Método: trata-se de um protocolo de revisão sistemática reportado segundo o Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. O protocolo foi registrado na International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. A busca será realizada em bases de dados variadas, combinando os descritores ‘Animal Assisted Therapy’, ‘Pain Management’ e ‘Controlled Clinical Trial’ e suas variações. Serão incluídos apenas ensaios clínicos randomizados e o gerenciamento dos resultados se dará nos softwares EndNote® e Rayyan®. A ferramenta Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias 2 será utilizada para avaliação do risco de viés, e a ferramenta Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation será utilizada para avaliação da certeza de evidência. Se possível, a metanálise será realizada para determinar o efeito da terapia assistida com animais sobre a intensidade da dor.
Referências
Ferrari MFM, Daher DV, Antunes JM, Amim EF, Jesus CM, Geraldo MA. Pain as the fifth vital sign, challenges for its incorporation in health training. REME (Online) [Internet]. 2019 Apr 15 [Cited 2021 Aug 15];23(e-1233):1-5. Available from: http://reme.org.br/artigo/detalhes/1379. doi: https://doi.org/10.5935/1415-2762.20190081
Zhang Y, Yan F, Li S, Wang Y, Ma Y. Effectiveness of animal-assisted therapy on pain in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Sci (Online) [Internet]. 2021 Jan 10 [Cited 2021 Aug 15];8(1):30-37. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013220301800?via%3Dihub. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2020.12.009
Dalmolin IS, Heidemann ITSB. Integrative and complementary practices in Primary Care: unveiling health promotion. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem (Online) [Internet]. 2020 Jun 08 [Cited 2021 Aug 15];28(e-3277):1-10. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/rlae/a/YzZcH3vhQ3P9qfrM4gnxz5y/?lang=en#. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.3162.3277
Mandrá PP, Moretti TCF, Avezum LA, Kuroishi RCS. Animal assisted therapy: systematic review of literature. CoDAS (Online) [Internet]. 2019 Jun 27 [Cited 2021 Aug 15];31(3):e20180243. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/codas/a/ndFPQNGM9n5D5yVVHsM9djj/?lang=pt. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20182018243
Rodrigo-Claverol M, Casanova-Gonzalo C, Malla-Clua B, Rodrigo-Claverol E, Jové-Naval J, Ortega-Bravo M. Animal-Assisted Intervention Improves Pain Perception in Polymedicated Geriatric Patients with Chronic Joint Pain: A Clinical Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health (Online) [Internet]. 2019 Aug 09 [Cited 2021 Aug 15];16(16):2843. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/16/2843. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162843
Feng Y, Lin Y, Zhang N, Jiang X, Zhang L. Effects of Animal-Assisted Therapy on Hospitalized Children and Teenagers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Pediatr Nurs (Online) [Internet]. 2021 Sep-Oct [Cited 2023 April 07];60:11-23. Available from: https://www.pediatricnursing.org/article/S0882-5963(21)00023-3/fulltext. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2021.01.020
Charry-Sánchez JD, Pradill I, Talero-Gutiérrez C. Effectiveness of Animal-Assisted Therapy in the Pediatric Population: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Studies. J Dev Behav Pediatr (Online) [Internet]. 2018 Sep [Cited 2023 April 07];39(7):580-590. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/jrnldbp/Abstract/2018/09000/Effectiveness_of_Animal_Assisted_Therapy_in_the.7.aspx. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000594
Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev (Online) [Internet]. 2015 Jan 01 [Cited 2021 Aug 15];4(1). Available from: https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
Aslam S, Emmanuel P. Formulating a researchable question: A critical step for facilitating good clinical research. Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS (Online) [Internet]. 2010 Sep 03 [Cited 2021 Aug 15];31(1):47-50. Available from: < https://www.ijstd.org/article.asp?issn=2589-0557;year=2010;volume=31;issue=1;spage=47;epage=50;aulast=Aslam>. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/0253-7184.69003
McGlinchey MP, James J, McKevitty C, Douiri A, McLachlan S, Sacley CM. The effect of rehabilitation interventions on physical function and immobility-related complications in severe stroke - protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev (Online) [Internet]. 2018 Nov 17 [Cited 2021 Aug 15];7(197):1-8. Available from: https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13643-018-0870-y#citeas. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0870-y
Younas A, Ali P. Five tips for developing useful literature summary tables for writing review articles. Evid Based Nurs (Online) [Internet]. 2021 Apr [Cited 2023 April 07];24(2):32-34. Available from: https://ebn.bmj.com/content/24/2/32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2021-103417
Higgins JPT, Savovic J, Page MJ, Sterne JAC. Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0). Cochrane (Online) [Internet]. 2016 Oct 20 [Cited 2021 Aug 15];7(197). Available from: https://www.unisa.edu.au/contentassets/72bf75606a2b4abcaf7f17404af374ad/rob2-0_indiv_main_guidance.pdf
Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Schmid CH. Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med AIDS (Online) [Internet]. 1997 Nov 01 [Cited 2021 Aug 15];127(9):820-826. Available from: https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/full/10.7326/0003-4819-127-9-199711010-00008. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-127-9-199711010-00008
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med (Online) [Internet]. 2002 May 21 [Cited 2021 Aug 15];21(11):1539-1558. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sim.1186. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Schünemann HJ, Tugwell P, Knottnerus A. GRADE guidelines: A new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol (Online) [Internet]. 2011 [Cited 2021 Aug 15];64(4):380-382. Available from: https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(10)00329-X/fulltext. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.011
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Array