Methodological quality, study designs, and epistemological precision in scientific production in nursing
PDF (Portuguese)
PDF (Spanish)
PDF
EPUB (Portuguese)
EPUB (Spanish)
EPUB
HTML (Portuguese)
HTML (Spanish)
HTML

Keywords

Methodological quality
Epistemological precision
Study design
Nursing research

How to Cite

1.
Lopes MV de O. Methodological quality, study designs, and epistemological precision in scientific production in nursing. Online Braz J Nurs [Internet]. 2026 Aug. 14 [cited 2026 Oct. 22];25(1):e20267139. Available from: https://objnursing.uff.br/nursing/article/view/7139

Abstract

Scientific excellence in nursing does not depend solely on the social relevance of the topic under investigation, the timeliness of the problem, or the sophistication of the analytical techniques employed. It depends, above all, on the coherence among the research question, the epistemological framework, the methodological design, the analytical procedures, and the strength of the conclusions presented. This coherence constitutes one of the core elements of methodological quality. When it is weak, a study may appear formally well structured but produce inferences that are imprecise, overstated, or incompatible with its own investigative architecture.

PDF (Portuguese)
PDF (Spanish)
PDF
EPUB (Portuguese)
EPUB (Spanish)
EPUB
HTML (Portuguese)
HTML (Spanish)
HTML

References

1. Aromataris E, Lockwood C, Porritt K, Pilla B, Jordan Z, editors. JBI manual for evidence synthesis [Internet]. Adelaide: JBI; 2024 [cited 2026 Jun 28]. Available from: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global/

2. American Educational Research Association; American Psychological Association; National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington: AERA; 2014.

3. Mokkink LB, Vet HCW de, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1171-1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4. PMID: 29260445.

4. Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby JM, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2021;374:n2061. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2061. PMID: 34593508.

5. Hopewell S, Chan AW, Collins GS, Hróbjartsson A, Moher D, Schulz KF, et al. CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials. BMJ. 2025;389:e081123. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-081123. PMID: 40228833.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing