Abstract
Scientific excellence in nursing does not depend solely on the social relevance of the topic under investigation, the timeliness of the problem, or the sophistication of the analytical techniques employed. It depends, above all, on the coherence among the research question, the epistemological framework, the methodological design, the analytical procedures, and the strength of the conclusions presented. This coherence constitutes one of the core elements of methodological quality. When it is weak, a study may appear formally well structured but produce inferences that are imprecise, overstated, or incompatible with its own investigative architecture.
References
1. Aromataris E, Lockwood C, Porritt K, Pilla B, Jordan Z, editors. JBI manual for evidence synthesis [Internet]. Adelaide: JBI; 2024 [cited 2026 Jun 28]. Available from: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global/
2. American Educational Research Association; American Psychological Association; National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington: AERA; 2014.
3. Mokkink LB, Vet HCW de, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1171-1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4. PMID: 29260445.
4. Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby JM, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2021;374:n2061. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2061. PMID: 34593508.
5. Hopewell S, Chan AW, Collins GS, Hróbjartsson A, Moher D, Schulz KF, et al. CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials. BMJ. 2025;389:e081123. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-081123. PMID: 40228833.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing

