Keywords
Photography
Documentation
Nursing
Quality improvement
Clinical governance
How to Cite
Abstract
Objective: To develop a technical protocol for standardizing photographic wound documentation in the clinical care context. Method: A technological development study conducted according to the SQUIRE 2.0 principles. Initially, a structured literature search was performed to establish technical parameters related to clinical wound photography. Based on the identified evidence, a preliminary version of the protocol was drafted. Subsequently, the instrument underwent technical evaluation in a controlled environment at the Laboratory of Scientific Documentation by Image of a Brazilian public university. Aspects such as camera positioning, distance, lighting, framing, use of a metric scale, color calibration, and image storage were analyzed, focusing on operational feasibility and technical reproducibility. Results: The evaluation allowed for the simplification of recommendations and adjustments to ensure practical applicability in the healthcare setting. The final protocol was organized into a checklist format, structured across three dimensions: preparation for documentation, the photographic act, and image storage and security, aiming for standardization, documentary traceability, and technical consistency. Conclusion: The developed protocol constitutes a structured tool for qualifying wound photographic documentation, contributing to the reduction of technical variability and the strengthening of care quality and clinical governance.
References
Onuh OC, Brydges HT, Nasr H, Savage E, Gorenstein S, Chiu E. Capturing Essentials in Wound Photography Past, Present, and Future: A Proposed Algorithm for Standardization. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2022;35(9):483–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000852564.21370.a4. PMID: 35993857.
Kientzy M, Bursztejn AC, Allaudeen AP, Chenuel B, Hamroun A, Allado E. Accuracy of digital measurement for quantitative and qualitative indicators of wound healing and repair: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open. 2024;14(5):e085969. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085969. PMID: 38821568.
Kivity S, Rajuan E, Arbeli S, Alcalay T, Shiri L, Orvieto N, et al. Optimising wound monitoring: Can digital tools improve healing outcomes and clinic efficiency. J Clin Nurs. 2024;33(10):4014–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17084. PMID: 38379311.
Foltynski P, Ladyzynski P. Digital Planimetry With a New Adaptive Calibration Procedure Results in Accurate and Precise Wound Area Measurement at Curved Surfaces. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022;16(1):128–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296820959346. PMID: 33000645.
Babaei N, Zamanzadeh V, Valizadeh L, Lotfi M, Kousha A, Samad-Soltani T, et al. Barriers to the implementation of virtual care programmes for patients with chronic wounds: Qualitative empirical research. Nurs Open. 2023;10(11):7301–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1983. PMID: 37612895.
Ilott I, Rick J, Patterson M, Turgoose C, Lacey A. What is protocol-based care? A concept analysis. J Nurs Manag. 2006;14(7):544–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2934.2006.00703.x. PMID: 17004965.
Bloemen EM, Rosen T, Cline Schiroo JA, Clark S, Mulcare MR, Stern ME, et al. Photographing Injuries in the Acute Care Setting: Development and Evaluation of a Standardized Protocol for Research, Forensics, and Clinical Practice. Acad Emerg Med. 2016;23(5):653–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12955. PMID: 26932497.
Zhang J, Mihai C, Tüshaus L, Scebba G, Distler O, Karlen W. Wound Image Quality From a Mobile Health Tool for Home-Based Chronic Wound Management With Real-Time Quality Feedback: Randomized Feasibility Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021;9(7):e26149. https://doi.org/10.2196/26149. PMID: 34328440.
Estocado N, Black J. Ten top tips: wound photo documentation. Wounds International [Internet]. 2019 [citado 2026 Fev 17];10(3):8-12. Disponível em: https://woundsinternational.com/journal-articles/ten-top-tips-wound-photo-documentation/
Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D, Batalden P, Davidoff F, Stevens D. SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(12):986–92. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411. PMID: 26369893.
Queen D, Harding K. Is wound photography becoming sloppy?. Int Wound J. 2020;17(1):5–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13302. PMID: 31930710.
Li KC, Lee YH, Lin YH. Automated Image-Based Wound Area Assessment in Outpatient Clinics Using Computer-Aided Methods: A Development and Validation Study. Medicina (Kaunas). 2025;61(6):1099. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61061099. PMID: 40572787.
Hsin PH, Lee TT, Liu CY, Chou SS, Mills ME. Exploring the Effectiveness of Nurses' Usage of a Wound-Photography System. Comput Inform Nurs. 2024;42(6):430–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000001095. PMID: 38478909.
Conselho Federal de Enfermagem (BR). Resolução COFEN Nº 554/2017. Estabelece os critérios norteadores das práticas de uso e de comportamento dos profissionais de enfermagem, nos meios de comunicação de massa: na mídia impressa, em peças publicitárias, de mobiliário urbano e nas mídias sociais [Internet]. Brasília: COFEN; 2017 [citado 2026 Fev 17]. Disponível em: https://www.cofen.gov.br/resolucao-cofen-no-05542017/
Chance EA, Florence D, Sardi Abdoul I. The effectiveness of checklists and error reporting systems in enhancing patient safety and reducing medical errors in hospital settings: A narrative review. Int J Nurs Sci. 2024;11(3):387–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.06.003. PMID: 39156684.
Etheridge JC, Moyal-Smith R, Yong TT, Lim SR, Sonnay Y, Lim C, et al. Transforming Team Performance Through Reimplementation of the Surgical Safety Checklist. JAMA Surg. 2024;159(1):78–86. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2023.5400. PMID: 37966829.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing