Palavras-chave
Validade dos Testes
Estudo de Validação
Avaliação em Enfermagem
Como Citar
Resumo
Objetivo:Explora a teoria da validade, abordando sua evolução histórica e sua influência na pesquisa e desenvolvimento de diagnósticos de enfermagem
Método:Estudo teórico - reflexivo baseado em pesquisa bibliográfica conduzida para entender a evolução semântica, epistemológica e metodológica da teoria da validade
Resultados:O desenvolvimento histórico da teoria da validade organiza-se em cinco fases principais: primórdios na China antiga, gênese do conceito, fragmentação teórica, a reunificação e a desconstrução. A análise histórica revelou como a teoria da validade tem sido fundamental na construção de estruturas diagnósticas e modelos de pesquisa, sendo, ao mesmo tempo, objeto de críticas e ampliações. A teoria da validade evoluiu com influências de diversas abordagens epistemológicas, incluindo diferentes abordagens como a trinitária, a unificada e a baseada em argumentos.
Conclusão:Este estudo oferece uma visão abrangente e crítica da teoria da validade, destacando suas implicações para o desenvolvimento uso de diagnósticos de enfermagem na teoria e na prática.
Referências
Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT, Petty RE. A Validity-Based Framework for Understanding Replication in Psychology. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2020;24(4):316-34 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868320931366. PMID: 32715894.
Borsboom D, Markus KA. Truth and Evidence in Validity Theory. J Educ Meas. 2013;50(1):110-114. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12006.
Borsboom D, Mellenbergh GJ, van Heerden J. The Concept of Validity. Psychol Rev. 2004;111(4):1061-1071. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.111.4.1061. PMID: 15482073.
Sireci S, Faulkner-Bond M. Validity evidence based on test content. Psicothema. 2014;1(26):100-107. https:// doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.256. PMID: 244447 37.
Pasquali L. Validade dos testes psicológicos: será possível reencontrar o caminho?. Psic., Teor. Pesq. (Online). 2007;23(spe):99-107. https://doi.org/10.159 0/s0102-37722007000500019.
Markus KA, Borsboom D. Frontiers of test validity theory: measurement, causation, and meaning. London: Routledge; 2013.
Pasquali L. Psicometria: teoria dos testes na psicologia e na educação. 4th ed. Petrópolis: Vozes; 2004.
Gordon M. Nursing diagnosis: process and application. 3rd ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1993.
Gordon M, Sweeney MA. Methodological Problems and Issues in Identifying and Standardizing Nursing Diagnoses. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1979;2(1):1-16. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-197910000-00002. PMID: 114094.
Borsboom D, Wijsen LD. Frankenstein’s validity monster: the value of keeping politics and science separated. Assess Educ. 2016;23(2):281-283. https:// doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2016.1141750.
Lopes MV de O, Silva VM da, Araujo TL de. Methods for Establishing the Accuracy of Clinical Indicators in Predicting Nursing Diagnoses. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2012;23(3):134-139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2047-3095.2012.01213.x. PMID: 23043652.
Lopes MV de O, Silva VM da, Herdman TH. Causation and Validation of Nursing Diagnoses: A Middle Range Theory. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2017;28(1): 53-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12104. PMID: 26095430.
Fehring RJ. Methods to validate nursing diagnoses. Heart Lung. 1987;16(6 Pt 1):625-629. PMID: 3679856.
Lopes MV de O, Silva VM da. Métodos avançados de validação de diagnósticos de enfermagem. In: Herdman TH, Napoleão AA, Lopes CT, Silva VM da, editores. PRONANDA: Programa de atualização em Diagnósticos de Enfermagem. Ciclo 4, v. 3. Porto Alegre: Artmed Panamericana; 2016. p. 31-74.
Creason NS. Clinical Validation of Nursing Diagnoses. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2004;15(4):1 23-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-618x.2004.tb0 0009.x. PMID: 15712860.
Lopes MV de O, Silva VM da, Araujo TL. Métodos de pesquisa para validação clínica de conceitos diagnósticos. In: Herdman TH, editor. PRONANDA: Programa de atualização em Diagnósticos de Enfermagem. Conceitos básicos. Porto Alegre: Artmed Panamericana; 2013. p. 87-132.
Lunney M. Critical Thinking and Accuracy of Nurses' Diagnoses. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2003;14(3): 96-107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-618x.2003.000 96.x. PMID: 14649031.
Mazalová L, Marečková J. Types of validity in the research of NANDA International components. Profese online. 2012;5(2):11-15. https://doi.org/10.550 7/pol.2012.011.
Tanner CA, Hughes AM. Nursing diagnosis: issues in clinical practice research. Top Clin Nurs. 1984;5(4):30 -38. PMID: 6558994
Whitley GG. Processes and Methodologies for Research Validation of Nursing Diagnoses. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 1999;10(1):5-14. https://doi.org/10.1 111/j.1744-618x.1999.tb00016.x. PMID: 10358519.
Haig BD. Construct Validation and Clinical Assessment. Behav Change. 1999;16(1):64-73. https:// doi.org/10.1375/bech.16.1.64.
DuBois PH. A history of psychological testing. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 1970.
Gregory RJ. The history of psychological testing. In: Gregory RJ, editor. Psychological testing: history, principles, and applications. 6th ed. London: Pearson Education; 2010. p. 56-81.
Newton PE, Shaw SD. Validity in educational & psychological assessment. London: Sage; 2014.
Borsboom D. Zen and the art of validity theory. Assess Educ. 2016;23(3):415-421. https://doi.org/10.1080/09 69594x.2015.1073479.
Galton F. Hereditary genius. London: Macmillan and Co.; 1869.
Cattell JM. V.—Mental Tests and Measurements. Mind. 1890;15(59):373-381. https://doi.org/10.1093/ mind/os-xv.59.373.
Spearman C. “General Intelligence,” Objectively Determined and Measured. Am J Psychol. 1904;15(2): 201-292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412107.
Burt CL. Historical sketch of the development of psychological tests. In: Board of Education, editor. Report of the consultative committee on psychological tests of educable capacity and their possible use in the public system of education. London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office; 1924. p. 1-61.
Meyer M. The Grading of Students. Science. 1908;28 (712):243-250. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.28.712 .243. PMID: 17820846.
Ruch GM. The objective or new-type examination: an introduction to educational measurement. Chicago: Scott, Foresman and Company; 1929.
Buckingham BR. Intelligence and its measurement: A symposium--XIV. J Educ Psychol. 1921;12(5):271-275. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0066019.
Ruch GM. The improvement of the written examination. Chicago: Scott, Foresman; 1924.
Beckstead JW. Content validity is naught. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46(9):1274-1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijnurstu.2009.04.014. PMID: 19486976.
Bingham WV. Aptitudes and aptitude testing. New York: Harper & Bros; 1937.
Kelley TL. Interpretation of educational measurements. New York: Macmillan; 1927.
Thurstone LL. The reliability and validity of tests: derivation and interpretation of fundamental formulae concerned with reliability and validity of tests and illustrative problems. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Edwards Brothers; 1932.
Sireci SG. The Construct of Content Validity. Soc Indic Res. 1998;45(1-3):83-117. https://doi.org/10.102 3/a:1006985528729.
Rulon PJ. On the validity of educational tests. Harv Educ Rev. 1946;16:290-296.
Kane MT. Current Concerns in Validity Theory. J Educ Meas. 2001;38(4):319-342. https://doi.org/10.11 11/j.1745-3984.2001.tb01130.x.
Shepard LA. Chapter 9: Evaluating Test Validity. Rev Res Educ. 1993;19(1):405-450. https://doi.org/10.310 2/0091732x019001405.
Bennett GK, Gordon HP. Personality test scores and success in the field of nursing. J Appl Psychol. 1944; 28(3):267-278. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056001.
Gordon HP. Study Habits Inventory scores and scholarship. J Appl Psychol. 1941;25(1):101-107. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0058849.
Hawkins NG. A Measure of Empirical Validity. Nurs Res. 1959;8(1):13-17. https://doi.org/10.1097/000061 99-195908010-00004.
Cronbach LJ. Essentials of psychological testing. New York: Harper & Brothers; 1949.
American Psychological Association. Committee on Test Standards. Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques: preliminary proposal. Am Psychol. 1952;7(8):461-475. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056631.
American Psychological Association. Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques. Psychol Bull. 1954;51(2, Pt.2):1-38. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0053479. PMID: 13155713.
Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull. 1955;52(4):281-302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957. PMID: 13245896.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: APA; 1974.
Chamorro IL, Davis ML, Green D, Kramer M. Development of an instrument to measure premature infant behavior and caretaker activities: time-sampling methodology. Nurs Res. 1973;22(4):300-309. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-197307000-00004. PMID: 4489647.
Feldman H. Validity of a feedback system for evaluation of pediatric nursing care. Nurs Res. 1965; 14(3):257-261.
Rodgers B, Ferhott J, Cooper CL. A Screening Tool to Detect Psychosocial Adjustment of Children with Cystic Fibrosis. Nurs Res. 1974;23(5):420-425. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-197409000-00009.
Bergman R, Edelstein A, Rotenberg A, Melamed Y. Psychological tests: their use and validity in selecting candidates for schools of nursing in Israel. Int J Nurs Stud. 1974;11(2):85-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020 -7489(74)90008-x. PMID: 4496609.
Johnson DM, Wilhite MJ. Reliability and Validity of Subjective Evaluation of Baccalaureate Program Nursing Students. Nurs Res. 1973;22(3):257-261. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-197305000-00012.
Mowbray JK, Taylor RG. Validity of Interest Inventories for the Prediction of Success in a School of Nursing. Nurs Res. 1967;16(1):78-80. https://doi.org/1 0.1097/00006199-196701610-00016.
Seither FG. A Predictive Validity Study of Screening Measures Used to Select Practical Nursing Students. Nurs Res. 1974;23(1):60-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/0 0006199-197401000-00013.
Yu Chao YM. [Validity and reliability of scoring performed nursing procedures]. Hu Li Za Zhi. 1974;21(4):50-60. Chinese. PMID: 4498580.
Zedeck S, Baker HT. Nursing performance as measured by behavioral expectation scales: A multitrait-multirater analysis. Organ Behav Hum Perform. 1972;7(3):457-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/0 030-5073(72)90029-3.
Carlson CE, Vernon DTA. Measurement of informativeness of hospital staff members. Nurs Res. 1973;22(3):198-204. https://doi.org/10.1097/0000619 9-197305000-00002.
Munson FC, Heda SS. An Instrument for Measuring Nursing Satisfaction. Nurs Res. 1974;23(2):159-165. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-197403000-00013.
Cronbach LJ. Test validation. In: Thorndike R, editor. Educational measurement. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Council on Education; 1971. p. 443-507.
Messick S. The standard problem: Meaning and values in measurement and evaluation. Am Psychol. 1975;30 (10):955-966. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.30.1 0.955.
Messick S. Test validity and the ethics of assessment. Am Psychol. 1980;35(11):1012-1027. https://doi.org/1 0.1037/0003-066x.35.11.1012.
Messick S. Meaning and Values in Test Validation: The Science and Ethics of Assessment. Educ Res. 1989;18(2):5-11. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x01 8002005.
Messick SJ. Validity. In: Linn RL, editor. Educational measurement. 3rd ed. New York: American Council on Education/Macmillan; 1989. p. 13-103.
Wolming S, Wikström C. The concept of validity in theory and practice. Assess Educ. 2010;17(2):117-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695941003693856.
Mehrens WA. The Consequences of Consequential Validity. Educational Measurement. 1997;16(2):16-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1997.tb00588 .x.
Popham WJ. Consequential validity: Right Concern‐Wrong Concept. Educational Measurement. 1997;16 (2):9-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1997.tb0 0586.x.
McDonald BR. Validation of Three Respiratory Nursing Diagnoses. Nurs Clin North Am. 1985;20(4):6 97-710. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-6465(22)01915 -6.
Munns DC. A Validation of the Defining Characteristics of the Nursing Diagnosis “Potential for Violence”. Nurs Clin North Am. 1985;20(4):711-722. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-6465(22)01916-8. PMID: 3852301.
Pokorny BE. Validating a Diagnostic Label. Nurs Clin North Am. 1985;20(4):641-655. https://doi.org/10.101 6/s0029-6465(22)01911-9.
Smith JK. Social reality as mind-dependent versus mind-independent and the interpretation of test validity. Journal of Research & Development in Education. 1985;19(1):1-9.
Vincent KG. The Validation of a Nursing Diagnosis. Nurs Clin North Am. 1985;20(4):631-640. https://doi. org/10.1016/s0029-6465(22)01910-7.
Voith AM, Smith DA. Validation of the Nursing Diagnosis of Urinary Retention. Nurs Clin North Am. 1985;20(4):723-729. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-64 65(22)01917-x.
Baird SE. Development of a Nursing Assessment Tool to Diagnose Altered Body Image in Immobilized Patients. Orthop Nurs. 1985;4(1):47-54. https://doi.org /10.1097/00006416-198501000-00009. PMID: 38447 13.
Gebbie KM, Lavin MA, editores. Classification of nursing diagnoses: proceedings of the first national conference. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby; 1975.
Feinstein AR. Clinical judgment. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1967.
Gordon M, Sweeney MA. Methodological Problems and Issues in Identifying and Standardizing Nursing Diagnoses. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1979;2(1):1-16. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-197910000-00002. PMID: 114094.
Farias JN, Nóbrega MML, Pérez VLAB, Coler MS. Diagnóstico de Enfermagem: uma abordagem conceitual e prática. João Pessoa: Santa Marta; 1990.
Hoskins LM. Clinical validation methodologies for nursing diagnosis research. In: Carroll-Johnson RM, editor. Classification of nursing diagnoses: proceedings of the eighth conference. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1989. p. 126-131.
Fehring RJ. The Fehring model. In: Carroll-Johnson RM, Paquette M, editores. Classification of nursing diagnoses: proceedings of the tenth conference. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1994. p. 55-62.
Kane MT. An argument-based approach to validity. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(3):527-535. https://doi.org/10. 1037/0033-2909.112.3.527.
Kane MT. Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. In: Lissitz RW, editor. The concept of validity. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing; 2009. p. 39-64.
Cizek GJ. Defining and distinguishing validity: Interpretations of score meaning and justifications of test use. Psychol Methods. 2012;17(1):31-43. https:// doi.org/10.1037/a0026975. PMID: 22268761.
Newton PE. Clarifying the Consensus Definition of Validity. Measurement (Mahwah N J). 2012;10(1-2):1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2012.6696 66.
Chang BL, Kim MJ, Jones P, McFarlane E, editores. Proceedings of the Invitational Conference on Research Methods for Validating Nursing Diagnoses; 1989 Abril 28-30. Palm Springs, CA. St. Louis: NANDA; 1989.
Chang BL. Reliability and construct validity. In: Chang BL, Kim MJ, Jones P, McFarlane E, editores. Invitational Conference on Research Methods for Validating Nursing Diagnoses; 1989; Palm Springs. California: NANDA; 1989. p. 217-232.
Creason NS. Clinical validation of Nursing diagnoses. In: Chang BL, Kim MJ, Jones P, McFarlane E, editores. Invitational Conference on Research Methods for Validating Nursing Diagnoses; 1989; Palm Springs. California: NANDA; 1989. p. 278-304.
Padilla GV. Tool development: reliability and related statistics. In: Chang BL, Kim MJ, Jones P, McFarlane E, editores. Invitational Conference on Research Methods for Validating Nursing Diagnoses; 1989; Palm Springs. California: NANDA; 1989. p. 177-184.
Schroeder MA. Tool development: validity related to nursing diagnoses. In: Chang BL, Kim MJ, Jones P, McFarlane E, editores. Invitational Conference on Research Methods for Validating Nursing Diagnoses; 1989; Palm Springs. California: NANDA; 1989. p. 147-165.
Gordon M. Concept development: response to Knafl. In: Chang BL, Kim MJ, Jones P, McFarlane E, editores. Invitational Conference on Research Methods for Validating Nursing Diagnoses; 1989; Palm Springs. California: NANDA; 1989. p. 64-74.
Miller JF. Differentiating phenomenologic and ethnographic research approaches: response to Dreher. In: Chang BL, Kim MJ, Jones P, McFarlane E, editores. Invitational Conference on Research Methods for Validating Nursing Diagnoses; 1989; Palm Springs. California: NANDA; 1989. p. 98-113.
Strauss A, Corban JM. Grounded Theory’s applicability to nursing diagnostic research. In: Chang BL, Kim MJ, Jones P, McFarlane E, editores. Invitational Conference on Research Methods for Validating Nursing Diagnoses; 1989; Palm Springs. California: NANDA; 1989. p. 4-24.
Thomas MD. Grounded Theory and Nursing Diagnosis. In: Chang BL, Kim MJ, Jones P, McFarlane E, editores. Invitational Conference on Research Methods for Validating Nursing Diagnoses; 1989; Palm Springs. California: NANDA; 1989. p. 25-36.
Knafl KA. Concept development. In: Chang BL, Kim MJ, Jones P, McFarlane E, editores. Invitational Conference on Research Methods for Validating Nursing Diagnoses; 1989; Palm Springs. California: NANDA; 1989. p. 37-63.
Alexander C. Epidemiologic approaches to validation of nursing diagnoses. In: Chang BL, Kim MJ, Jones P, McFarlane E, editores. Invitational Conference on Research Methods for Validating Nursing Diagnoses; 1989; Palm Springs. California: NANDA; 1989. p. 121-136.
Fritzmaurice J. Tool development: validity related to nursing diagnoses – response to Schroeder. In: Chang BL, Kim MJ, Jones P, McFarlane E, editores. Invitational Conference on Research Methods for Validating Nursing Diagnoses; 1989; Palm Springs. California: NANDA; 1989. p. 166-176.
Oliveira-Kumakura AR de S, Caldeira S, Simão TP, Camargo-Figuera FA, Cruz D de ALM da, Carvalho EC de. The Contribution of the Rasch Model to the Clinical Validation of Nursing Diagnoses: Integrative Literature Review. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2018;29(2):89-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12162. PMID: 27781407.
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing