Influências históricas da teoria da validade sobre a pesquisa em diagnósticos de enfermagem

Lopes MV de O, Silva VM da. Historical influences of validity theory on nursing diagnosis research. Online Braz J Nurs [Internet]. 2026 Apr. 7 [cited 2026 Apr. 25];25(1):e20266851. Available from: https://objnursing.uff.br/nursing/article/view/6851

Abstract

Objective:

To explore validity theory through a historical approach and analyze its influence on research and the development of nursing diagnoses.

Method:

A theoretical-reflective study based on bibliographic research was conducted to understand the semantic, epistemological, and methodological evolution of validity theory.

Results:

The historical development of validity theory is organized into five main phases: beginnings in ancient China, the genesis of the concept, theoretical fragmentation, reunification, and deconstruction. The analysis revealed how this theory has been fundamental in constructing diagnostic structures and research models, while simultaneously being an object of criticism and expansion. Validity theory evolved under the influence of various epistemological currents, including the trinitarian, unified, and argument-based approaches. Conclusion: This study offers a comprehensive and critical view of validity theory, highlighting its implications for the development and use of nursing diagnoses in both theory and practice.

PDF (Portuguese)

PDF (Spanish)

PDF

EPUB (Portuguese)

EPUB (Spanish)

EPUB

HTML (Portuguese)

HTML (Spanish)

HTML

References

Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT, Petty RE. A Validity-Based Framework for Understanding Replication in Psychology. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2020;24(4):316-34 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868320931366. PMID: 32715894.

Borsboom D, Markus KA. Truth and Evidence in Validity Theory. J Educ Meas. 2013;50(1):110-114. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12006.

Borsboom D, Mellenbergh GJ, van Heerden J. The Concept of Validity. Psychol Rev. 2004;111(4):1061-1071. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.111.4.1061. PMID: 15482073.

Sireci S, Faulkner-Bond M. Validity evidence based on test content. Psicothema. 2014;1(26):100-107. https:// doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.256. PMID: 244447 37.

Pasquali L. Validade dos testes psicológicos: será possível reencontrar o caminho?. Psic., Teor. Pesq. (Online). 2007;23(spe):99-107. https://doi.org/10.159 0/s0102-37722007000500019.

Markus KA, Borsboom D. Frontiers of test validity theory: measurement, causation, and meaning. London: Routledge; 2013.

Pasquali L. Psicometria: teoria dos testes na psicologia e na educação. 4th ed. Petrópolis: Vozes; 2004.

Gordon M. Nursing diagnosis: process and application. 3rd ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1993.

Gordon M, Sweeney MA. Methodological Problems and Issues in Identifying and Standardizing Nursing Diagnoses. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1979;2(1):1-16. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-197910000-00002. PMID: 114094.

Borsboom D, Wijsen LD. Frankenstein’s validity monster: the value of keeping politics and science separated. Assess Educ. 2016;23(2):281-283. https:// doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2016.1141750.

Lopes MV de O, Silva VM da, Araujo TL de. Methods for Establishing the Accuracy of Clinical Indicators in Predicting Nursing Diagnoses. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2012;23(3):134-139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2047-3095.2012.01213.x. PMID: 23043652.

Lopes MV de O, Silva VM da, Herdman TH. Causation and Validation of Nursing Diagnoses: A Middle Range Theory. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2017;28(1): 53-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12104. PMID: 26095430.

Fehring RJ. Methods to validate nursing diagnoses. Heart Lung. 1987;16(6 Pt 1):625-629. PMID: 3679856.

Lopes MV de O, Silva VM da. Métodos avançados de validação de diagnósticos de enfermagem. In: Herdman TH, Napoleão AA, Lopes CT, Silva VM da, editores. PRONANDA: Programa de atualização em Diagnósticos de Enfermagem. Ciclo 4, v. 3. Porto Alegre: Artmed Panamericana; 2016. p. 31-74.

Creason NS. Clinical Validation of Nursing Diagnoses. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2004;15(4):1 23-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-618x.2004.tb0 0009.x. PMID: 15712860.

Lopes MV de O, Silva VM da, Araujo TL. Métodos de pesquisa para validação clínica de conceitos diagnósticos. In: Herdman TH, editor. PRONANDA: Programa de atualização em Diagnósticos de Enfermagem. Conceitos básicos. Porto Alegre: Artmed Panamericana; 2013. p. 87-132.

Lunney M. Critical Thinking and Accuracy of Nurses' Diagnoses. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2003;14(3): 96-107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-618x.2003.000 96.x. PMID: 14649031.

Mazalová L, Marečková J. Types of validity in the research of NANDA International components. Profese online. 2012;5(2):11-15. https://doi.org/10.550 7/pol.2012.011.

Tanner CA, Hughes AM. Nursing diagnosis: issues in clinical practice research. Top Clin Nurs. 1984;5(4):30 -38. PMID: 6558994

Whitley GG. Processes and Methodologies for Research Validation of Nursing Diagnoses. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 1999;10(1):5-14. https://doi.org/10.1 111/j.1744-618x.1999.tb00016.x. PMID: 10358519.

Haig BD. Construct Validation and Clinical Assessment. Behav Change. 1999;16(1):64-73. https:// doi.org/10.1375/bech.16.1.64.

DuBois PH. A history of psychological testing. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 1970.

Gregory RJ. The history of psychological testing. In: Gregory RJ, editor. Psychological testing: history, principles, and applications. 6th ed. London: Pearson Education; 2010. p. 56-81.

Newton PE, Shaw SD. Validity in educational & psychological assessment. London: Sage; 2014.

Borsboom D. Zen and the art of validity theory. Assess Educ. 2016;23(3):415-421. https://doi.org/10.1080/09 69594x.2015.1073479.

Galton F. Hereditary genius. London: Macmillan and Co.; 1869.

Cattell JM. V.—Mental Tests and Measurements. Mind. 1890;15(59):373-381. https://doi.org/10.1093/ mind/os-xv.59.373.

Spearman C. “General Intelligence,” Objectively Determined and Measured. Am J Psychol. 1904;15(2): 201-292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412107.

Burt CL. Historical sketch of the development of psychological tests. In: Board of Education, editor. Report of the consultative committee on psychological tests of educable capacity and their possible use in the public system of education. London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office; 1924. p. 1-61.

Meyer M. The Grading of Students. Science. 1908;28 (712):243-250. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.28.712 .243. PMID: 17820846.

Ruch GM. The objective or new-type examination: an introduction to educational measurement. Chicago: Scott, Foresman and Company; 1929.

Buckingham BR. Intelligence and its measurement: A symposium--XIV. J Educ Psychol. 1921;12(5):271-275. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0066019.

Ruch GM. The improvement of the written examination. Chicago: Scott, Foresman; 1924.

Beckstead JW. Content validity is naught. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46(9):1274-1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijnurstu.2009.04.014. PMID: 19486976.

Bingham WV. Aptitudes and aptitude testing. New York: Harper & Bros; 1937.

Kelley TL. Interpretation of educational measurements. New York: Macmillan; 1927.

Thurstone LL. The reliability and validity of tests: derivation and interpretation of fundamental formulae concerned with reliability and validity of tests and illustrative problems. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Edwards Brothers; 1932.

Sireci SG. The Construct of Content Validity. Soc Indic Res. 1998;45(1-3):83-117. https://doi.org/10.102 3/a:1006985528729.

Rulon PJ. On the validity of educational tests. Harv Educ Rev. 1946;16:290-296.

Kane MT. Current Concerns in Validity Theory. J Educ Meas. 2001;38(4):319-342. https://doi.org/10.11 11/j.1745-3984.2001.tb01130.x.

Shepard LA. Chapter 9: Evaluating Test Validity. Rev Res Educ. 1993;19(1):405-450. https://doi.org/10.310 2/0091732x019001405.

Bennett GK, Gordon HP. Personality test scores and success in the field of nursing. J Appl Psychol. 1944; 28(3):267-278. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056001.

Gordon HP. Study Habits Inventory scores and scholarship. J Appl Psychol. 1941;25(1):101-107. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0058849.

Hawkins NG. A Measure of Empirical Validity. Nurs Res. 1959;8(1):13-17. https://doi.org/10.1097/000061 99-195908010-00004.

Cronbach LJ. Essentials of psychological testing. New York: Harper & Brothers; 1949.

American Psychological Association. Committee on Test Standards. Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques: preliminary proposal. Am Psychol. 1952;7(8):461-475. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056631.

American Psychological Association. Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques. Psychol Bull. 1954;51(2, Pt.2):1-38. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0053479. PMID: 13155713.

Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull. 1955;52(4):281-302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957. PMID: 13245896.

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: APA; 1974.

Chamorro IL, Davis ML, Green D, Kramer M. Development of an instrument to measure premature infant behavior and caretaker activities: time-sampling methodology. Nurs Res. 1973;22(4):300-309. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-197307000-00004. PMID: 4489647.

Feldman H. Validity of a feedback system for evaluation of pediatric nursing care. Nurs Res. 1965; 14(3):257-261.

Rodgers B, Ferhott J, Cooper CL. A Screening Tool to Detect Psychosocial Adjustment of Children with Cystic Fibrosis. Nurs Res. 1974;23(5):420-425. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-197409000-00009.

Bergman R, Edelstein A, Rotenberg A, Melamed Y. Psychological tests: their use and validity in selecting candidates for schools of nursing in Israel. Int J Nurs Stud. 1974;11(2):85-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020 -7489(74)90008-x. PMID: 4496609.

Johnson DM, Wilhite MJ. Reliability and Validity of Subjective Evaluation of Baccalaureate Program Nursing Students. Nurs Res. 1973;22(3):257-261. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-197305000-00012.

Mowbray JK, Taylor RG. Validity of Interest Inventories for the Prediction of Success in a School of Nursing. Nurs Res. 1967;16(1):78-80. https://doi.org/1 0.1097/00006199-196701610-00016.

Seither FG. A Predictive Validity Study of Screening Measures Used to Select Practical Nursing Students. Nurs Res. 1974;23(1):60-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/0 0006199-197401000-00013.

Yu Chao YM. [Validity and reliability of scoring performed nursing procedures]. Hu Li Za Zhi. 1974;21(4):50-60. Chinese. PMID: 4498580.

Zedeck S, Baker HT. Nursing performance as measured by behavioral expectation scales: A multitrait-multirater analysis. Organ Behav Hum Perform. 1972;7(3):457-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/0 030-5073(72)90029-3.

Carlson CE, Vernon DTA. Measurement of informativeness of hospital staff members. Nurs Res. 1973;22(3):198-204. https://doi.org/10.1097/0000619 9-197305000-00002.

Munson FC, Heda SS. An Instrument for Measuring Nursing Satisfaction. Nurs Res. 1974;23(2):159-165. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-197403000-00013.

Cronbach LJ. Test validation. In: Thorndike R, editor. Educational measurement. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Council on Education; 1971. p. 443-507.

Messick S. The standard problem: Meaning and values in measurement and evaluation. Am Psychol. 1975;30 (10):955-966. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.30.1 0.955.

Messick S. Test validity and the ethics of assessment. Am Psychol. 1980;35(11):1012-1027. https://doi.org/1 0.1037/0003-066x.35.11.1012.

Messick S. Meaning and Values in Test Validation: The Science and Ethics of Assessment. Educ Res. 1989;18(2):5-11. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x01 8002005.

Messick SJ. Validity. In: Linn RL, editor. Educational measurement. 3rd ed. New York: American Council on Education/Macmillan; 1989. p. 13-103.

Wolming S, Wikström C. The concept of validity in theory and practice. Assess Educ. 2010;17(2):117-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695941003693856.

Mehrens WA. The Consequences of Consequential Validity. Educational Measurement. 1997;16(2):16-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1997.tb00588 .x.

Popham WJ. Consequential validity: Right Concern‐Wrong Concept. Educational Measurement. 1997;16 (2):9-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1997.tb0 0586.x.

McDonald BR. Validation of Three Respiratory Nursing Diagnoses. Nurs Clin North Am. 1985;20(4):6 97-710. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-6465(22)01915 -6.

Munns DC. A Validation of the Defining Characteristics of the Nursing Diagnosis “Potential for Violence”. Nurs Clin North Am. 1985;20(4):711-722. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-6465(22)01916-8. PMID: 3852301.

Pokorny BE. Validating a Diagnostic Label. Nurs Clin North Am. 1985;20(4):641-655. https://doi.org/10.101 6/s0029-6465(22)01911-9.

Smith JK. Social reality as mind-dependent versus mind-independent and the interpretation of test validity. Journal of Research & Development in Education. 1985;19(1):1-9.

Vincent KG. The Validation of a Nursing Diagnosis. Nurs Clin North Am. 1985;20(4):631-640. https://doi. org/10.1016/s0029-6465(22)01910-7.

Voith AM, Smith DA. Validation of the Nursing Diagnosis of Urinary Retention. Nurs Clin North Am. 1985;20(4):723-729. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-64 65(22)01917-x.

Baird SE. Development of a Nursing Assessment Tool to Diagnose Altered Body Image in Immobilized Patients. Orthop Nurs. 1985;4(1):47-54. https://doi.org /10.1097/00006416-198501000-00009. PMID: 38447 13.

Gebbie KM, Lavin MA, editores. Classification of nursing diagnoses: proceedings of the first national conference. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby; 1975.

Feinstein AR. Clinical judgment. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1967.

Gordon M, Sweeney MA. Methodological Problems and Issues in Identifying and Standardizing Nursing Diagnoses. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1979;2(1):1-16. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-197910000-00002. PMID: 114094.

Farias JN, Nóbrega MML, Pérez VLAB, Coler MS. Diagnóstico de Enfermagem: uma abordagem conceitual e prática. João Pessoa: Santa Marta; 1990.

Hoskins LM. Clinical validation methodologies for nursing diagnosis research. In: Carroll-Johnson RM, editor. Classification of nursing diagnoses: proceedings of the eighth conference. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1989. p. 126-131.

Fehring RJ. The Fehring model. In: Carroll-Johnson RM, Paquette M, editores. Classification of nursing diagnoses: proceedings of the tenth conference. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1994. p. 55-62.

Kane MT. An argument-based approach to validity. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(3):527-535. https://doi.org/10. 1037/0033-2909.112.3.527.

Kane MT. Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. In: Lissitz RW, editor. The concept of validity. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing; 2009. p. 39-64.

Cizek GJ. Defining and distinguishing validity: Interpretations of score meaning and justifications of test use. Psychol Methods. 2012;17(1):31-43. https:// doi.org/10.1037/a0026975. PMID: 22268761.

Newton PE. Clarifying the Consensus Definition of Validity. Measurement (Mahwah N J). 2012;10(1-2):1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2012.6696 66.

Chang BL, Kim MJ, Jones P, McFarlane E, editores. Proceedings of the Invitational Conference on Research Methods for Validating Nursing Diagnoses; 1989 Abril 28-30. Palm Springs, CA. St. Louis: NANDA; 1989.

Chang BL. Reliability and construct validity. In: Chang BL, Kim MJ, Jones P, McFarlane E, editores. Invitational Conference on Research Methods for Validating Nursing Diagnoses; 1989; Palm Springs. California: NANDA; 1989. p. 217-232.

Creason NS. Clinical validation of Nursing diagnoses. In: Chang BL, Kim MJ, Jones P, McFarlane E, editores. Invitational Conference on Research Methods for Validating Nursing Diagnoses; 1989; Palm Springs. California: NANDA; 1989. p. 278-304.

Padilla GV. Tool development: reliability and related statistics. In: Chang BL, Kim MJ, Jones P, McFarlane E, editores. Invitational Conference on Research Methods for Validating Nursing Diagnoses; 1989; Palm Springs. California: NANDA; 1989. p. 177-184.

Schroeder MA. Tool development: validity related to nursing diagnoses. In: Chang BL, Kim MJ, Jones P, McFarlane E, editores. Invitational Conference on Research Methods for Validating Nursing Diagnoses; 1989; Palm Springs. California: NANDA; 1989. p. 147-165.

Gordon M. Concept development: response to Knafl. In: Chang BL, Kim MJ, Jones P, McFarlane E, editores. Invitational Conference on Research Methods for Validating Nursing Diagnoses; 1989; Palm Springs. California: NANDA; 1989. p. 64-74.

Miller JF. Differentiating phenomenologic and ethnographic research approaches: response to Dreher. In: Chang BL, Kim MJ, Jones P, McFarlane E, editores. Invitational Conference on Research Methods for Validating Nursing Diagnoses; 1989; Palm Springs. California: NANDA; 1989. p. 98-113.

Strauss A, Corban JM. Grounded Theory’s applicability to nursing diagnostic research. In: Chang BL, Kim MJ, Jones P, McFarlane E, editores. Invitational Conference on Research Methods for Validating Nursing Diagnoses; 1989; Palm Springs. California: NANDA; 1989. p. 4-24.

Thomas MD. Grounded Theory and Nursing Diagnosis. In: Chang BL, Kim MJ, Jones P, McFarlane E, editores. Invitational Conference on Research Methods for Validating Nursing Diagnoses; 1989; Palm Springs. California: NANDA; 1989. p. 25-36.

Knafl KA. Concept development. In: Chang BL, Kim MJ, Jones P, McFarlane E, editores. Invitational Conference on Research Methods for Validating Nursing Diagnoses; 1989; Palm Springs. California: NANDA; 1989. p. 37-63.

Alexander C. Epidemiologic approaches to validation of nursing diagnoses. In: Chang BL, Kim MJ, Jones P, McFarlane E, editores. Invitational Conference on Research Methods for Validating Nursing Diagnoses; 1989; Palm Springs. California: NANDA; 1989. p. 121-136.

Fritzmaurice J. Tool development: validity related to nursing diagnoses – response to Schroeder. In: Chang BL, Kim MJ, Jones P, McFarlane E, editores. Invitational Conference on Research Methods for Validating Nursing Diagnoses; 1989; Palm Springs. California: NANDA; 1989. p. 166-176.

Oliveira-Kumakura AR de S, Caldeira S, Simão TP, Camargo-Figuera FA, Cruz D de ALM da, Carvalho EC de. The Contribution of the Rasch Model to the Clinical Validation of Nursing Diagnoses: Integrative Literature Review. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2018;29(2):89-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12162. PMID: 27781407.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Historical influences of validity theory on nursing diagnosis research

Keywords

How to Cite

Download Citation

Abstract

References