Resumo
Objetivo: Sintetizar as principais evidências científicas sobre a influência do letramento funcional em saúde e da numeracia em pessoas com diabetes que realizam automonitorização da glicemia capilar. Método: Revisão sistemática de métodos mistos convergentes e segregados, conduzidoconduzidos e desenvolvidodesenvolvidos de acordo com as premissas do Joanna Briggs Institute. Uma busca por estudos publicados e não publicados será realizada no MEDLINE (PubMed), LILACS, CINAHL, Web of Science, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), Google Scholar, OPENGREY e Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (NDLTD). Não haverá restrições de idioma ou intervalo temporal de publicação. Os documentos científicos identificados serão organizados com auxílio do EndNote, e documentos repetidos, serão excluídos, mantendo apenas uma versão. A seleção ocorrerá mediante análise de revisores independentes, que analisarão e avaliarão criticamente os estudos selecionados e extrairão dados usando instrumentos padronizados com ajuda do software Rayyan. Os resultados da revisão serão relatados de acordo com as diretrizes PRISMA. Número de registro na plataforma PROSPERO: CRD42023408045.
Referências
Ogurtsova K, Guariguata L, Barengo NC, Lopez-Doriga Ruiz P, Sacre JW, Karuranga S, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of undiagnosed diabetes in adults for 2021. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021; 183:109118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109118
World Health Organization. WHO reveals leading causes of death and disability worldwide: 2000-2019 [Internet]. www.who.int. 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/09-12-2020-who-reveals-leading-causes-of- death and disability-worldwide-2000-2019
American Diabetes Association. Introduction: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care. 2020;44(Supplement 1):S1-2. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-Sint
Maiorino MI, Signoriello S, Maio A, Chiodini P, Bellastella G, Scappaticcio L, et al. Effects of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Metrics of Glycemic Control in Diabetes: A Systematic Review with Meta -analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(5):1146-56. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-1459
Açıl D, Bahar Z. Perceived barriers to diabetes management at home: a qualitative study. Turk Biyokim Derg. 2019 Jan 8;0(0). https://doi.org/10.1515/tjb-2018-0343
Montero AR, Toro-Tobon D, Gann K, Nassar CM, Youssef GA, Magee MF. Implications of remote monitoring Technology in Optimizing Traditional Self - Monitoring of blood glucose in adults with T2DM in primary care. BMC Endocr Disord. 2021;21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-021-00884-6
Broos B, Charleer S, Bolsens N, Moyson C, Mathieu C, Gillard P, et al. Diabetes Knowledge and Metabolic Control in Type 1 Diabetes Starting With Continuous Glucose Monitoring: FUTURE-PEAK. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;106(8): e3037 -48. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgab188
Sørensen K, Van den Broucke S, Fullam J, Doyle G, Pelikan J, Slonska Z, et al. Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-80
Osborn CY, Cavanaugh K, Kripalani S. Strategies to Address Low Health Literacy and Numeracy in Diabetes. Clin Diabetes. 2010;28(4):171-5. https://doi.org/10.2337/diaclin.28.4.171
Al Sayah F, Majumdar SR, Williams B, Robertson S, Johnson JA. Health Literacy and Health Outcomes in Diabetes: A Systematic Review. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;28(3):444 -52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2241-z
Visentin D. Health numeracy in research and clinical practice. Nurs Health Sci. 2019 Jun;21(2):139–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12597
Hussain N, Said ASA, Khan Z. Influence of Health Literacy on Medication Adherence Among Elderly Females With Type 2 Diabetes in Pakistan. Int Q Community Health Educ. 2019 Dec 30;41(1):35–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272684X19896724
Kim SH, Lee A. Health-Literacy-Sensitive Diabetes Self-Management Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2016 Apr 22;13(4):324–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12157
Caruso R, Magon A, Baroni I, Dellafiore F, Arrigoni C, Pittella F, et al. Health literacy in type 2 diabetes patients: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Acta Diabetol. 2017 Nov 11;55(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-017-1071-1
Dahal PK, Hosseinzadeh H. Association of health literacy and diabetes self-management: a systematic review. Aust J Prim Health. 2019;25(6):526. https://doi.org/10.1071/PY19007
Marciano L, Camerini AL, Schulz PJ. The Role of Health Literacy in Diabetes Knowledge, Self-Care, and Glycemic Control: a Meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Mar 15;34(6):1007–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-04832-y
Al Sayah F, Williams B, Johnson JA. Measuring Health Literacy in Individuals With Diabetes. Health Educ Behav. 2012 Apr 9;40(1):42–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198111436341
Lizarondo L, Stern C, Carrier J, Godfrey C, Rieger K, Salmond S, et al. Chapter 8: Mixed methods systematic reviews. In: JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI; 2020. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-09
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;134:103–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.003
Oliveira Araújo WC. Recuperação da informação em saúde: construção, modelos e estratégias. ConCI. 2020; 3(2):100-34. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufs.br/conci/article/view/13447
Joanna Briggs Institute. Critical appraisal tools [Internet]. jbi.global. Joanna Briggs Institute; 2020. [cited 2023 jun 22]. Disponível em: https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;10(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. PRISMA 2020 Explanation and elaboration: Updated Guidance and Exemplars for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372(160). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
Munn Z, Aromataris E, Tufanaru C, Stern C, Porritt K, Farrow J, et al. The development of software to support multiple systematic review types. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2018; 17(1):36-43. https://doi.org/10.1097/xeb.0000000000000152
Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI; 2020. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-01
Cardoso V, Trevisan I, Cicolella D de A, Waterkemper R. systematic review of mixed methods: method of research for the incorporation of evidence in nursing. Text & Context. Nursing. 2019;28: e20170279. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-265X-TCE-2017-0279
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Array