Influence of health Literacy on the self-monitoring of capillary glycemia: a systematic review protocol
HTML
HTML (Português (Brasil))
EPUB
EPUB (Português (Brasil))
PDF
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Supplementary Files

AUDIO
AUDIO (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Glucose self-monitoring
Diabetes Mellitus
Health literacy Automonitorização da Glicemia
Diabetes Mellitus
Letramento em Saúde

PlumX Metrics

Abstract

Objective: TO synthesize the main scientific evidence on the influence of functional literacy on health and numeracy in people with diabetes who perform self-monitoring of capillary glycemia. Method: Systematic review of convergent and segregated mixed methods conducted and developed according to the premises of the Joanna Briggs Institute. A search for published and unpublished studies will be carried out in MEDLINE (PubMed), LILACS, CINAHL, Web of Science, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library (central), Google Scholar, OPENGRAY, and Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (NDLTD). There will be no language restrictions or time interval of publication. The identified scientific documents will be organized with the help of EndNote and repeated documents will be deleted, keeping only one version. Selection will take place through analysis of independent reviewers, who will critically analyze and evaluate the selected studies and extract data using standardized instruments with the help of Rayyan software. The results of the review will be reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. Registration number on PROSPERO platform: CRD42023408045

https://doi.org/10.17665/1676-4285.20246719
HTML
HTML (Português (Brasil))
EPUB
EPUB (Português (Brasil))
PDF
PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

Ogurtsova K, Guariguata L, Barengo NC, Lopez-Doriga Ruiz P, Sacre JW, Karuranga S, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of undiagnosed diabetes in adults for 2021. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021; 183:109118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109118

World Health Organization. WHO reveals leading causes of death and disability worldwide: 2000-2019 [Internet]. www.who.int. 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/09-12-2020-who-reveals-leading-causes-of- death and disability-worldwide-2000-2019

American Diabetes Association. Introduction: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care. 2020;44(Supplement 1):S1-2. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-Sint

Maiorino MI, Signoriello S, Maio A, Chiodini P, Bellastella G, Scappaticcio L, et al. Effects of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Metrics of Glycemic Control in Diabetes: A Systematic Review with Meta -analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(5):1146-56. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-1459

Açıl D, Bahar Z. Perceived barriers to diabetes management at home: a qualitative study. Turk Biyokim Derg. 2019 Jan 8;0(0). https://doi.org/10.1515/tjb-2018-0343

Montero AR, Toro-Tobon D, Gann K, Nassar CM, Youssef GA, Magee MF. Implications of remote monitoring Technology in Optimizing Traditional Self - Monitoring of blood glucose in adults with T2DM in primary care. BMC Endocr Disord. 2021;21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-021-00884-6

Broos B, Charleer S, Bolsens N, Moyson C, Mathieu C, Gillard P, et al. Diabetes Knowledge and Metabolic Control in Type 1 Diabetes Starting With Continuous Glucose Monitoring: FUTURE-PEAK. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;106(8): e3037 -48. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgab188

Sørensen K, Van den Broucke S, Fullam J, Doyle G, Pelikan J, Slonska Z, et al. Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-80

Osborn CY, Cavanaugh K, Kripalani S. Strategies to Address Low Health Literacy and Numeracy in Diabetes. Clin Diabetes. 2010;28(4):171-5. https://doi.org/10.2337/diaclin.28.4.171

Al Sayah F, Majumdar SR, Williams B, Robertson S, Johnson JA. Health Literacy and Health Outcomes in Diabetes: A Systematic Review. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;28(3):444 -52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2241-z

Visentin D. Health numeracy in research and clinical practice. Nurs Health Sci. 2019 Jun;21(2):139–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12597

Hussain N, Said ASA, Khan Z. Influence of Health Literacy on Medication Adherence Among Elderly Females With Type 2 Diabetes in Pakistan. Int Q Community Health Educ. 2019 Dec 30;41(1):35–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272684X19896724

Kim SH, Lee A. Health-Literacy-Sensitive Diabetes Self-Management Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2016 Apr 22;13(4):324–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12157

Caruso R, Magon A, Baroni I, Dellafiore F, Arrigoni C, Pittella F, et al. Health literacy in type 2 diabetes patients: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Acta Diabetol. 2017 Nov 11;55(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-017-1071-1

Dahal PK, Hosseinzadeh H. Association of health literacy and diabetes self-management: a systematic review. Aust J Prim Health. 2019;25(6):526. https://doi.org/10.1071/PY19007

Marciano L, Camerini AL, Schulz PJ. The Role of Health Literacy in Diabetes Knowledge, Self-Care, and Glycemic Control: a Meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Mar 15;34(6):1007–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-04832-y

Al Sayah F, Williams B, Johnson JA. Measuring Health Literacy in Individuals With Diabetes. Health Educ Behav. 2012 Apr 9;40(1):42–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198111436341

Lizarondo L, Stern C, Carrier J, Godfrey C, Rieger K, Salmond S, et al. Chapter 8: Mixed methods systematic reviews. In: JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI; 2020. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-09

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;134:103–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.003

Oliveira Araújo WC. Recuperação da informação em saúde: construção, modelos e estratégias. ConCI. 2020; 3(2):100-34. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufs.br/conci/article/view/13447

Joanna Briggs Institute. Critical appraisal tools [Internet]. jbi.global. Joanna Briggs Institute; 2020. [cited 2023 jun 22]. Disponível em: https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;10(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. PRISMA 2020 Explanation and elaboration: Updated Guidance and Exemplars for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372(160). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160

Munn Z, Aromataris E, Tufanaru C, Stern C, Porritt K, Farrow J, et al. The development of software to support multiple systematic review types. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2018; 17(1):36-43. https://doi.org/10.1097/xeb.0000000000000152

Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI; 2020. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-01

Cardoso V, Trevisan I, Cicolella D de A, Waterkemper R. systematic review of mixed methods: method of research for the incorporation of evidence in nursing. Text & Context. Nursing. 2019;28: e20170279. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-265X-TCE-2017-0279

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Array