Resumo
Objetivo: compreender os fatores facilitadores e dificultadores no parto imaginados pelas gestantes e vivenciados pelas parturientes. Método: trata-se de um estudo descritivo, qualitativo tendo como referencial teórico o Interacionalismo Simbólico. A coleta de dados ocorreu por meio de oficinas, entrevista semi estruturada no pré e pós parto. Os dados foram analisados por meio de análise de conteúdo. Resultados: Participaram do estudo 11 mulheres no pré parto e oficina e 05 no pós parto. Foram identificadas duas categorias: Parto: experiência marcante; Entre expectativas e vivencias. Discussão: Nas expectativas e na realidade sobre os fatores dificultadores e facilitadores no momento do parto estiveram presentes significados construidos e modificados pelas interações com profissionais e rede social. Conclusão: A vivencia do parto pode ressignificar paradigmas culturais e sociais. A valorização das técnicas relacionais qualifica a assistência na direção da construção de significados e experiências.
Referências
Vendrúscolo CT, Kruel CS. The history of childbirth: from homes to hospitals, midwives to physicians, subjects to objects. Disciplinarum Scientia: Ciências Humanas. [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2020 mar 15]; 16(1):95-107. Available from: http://doi.org/10.37780/ch.v16i1.1842.
Santos S, Fabbro MRC. The difficult task of choosing natural childbirth. Cienc Enferm. [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 mar 15]; 24:11. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0717-95532018000100211.
Souza Y, Faro A. Predilection, expectation and birth experience: what do they think pregnant and primiparae?. Psic Saúde & Doenças. [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 mar 15]; 19(2):243-54. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.15309/18psd190207.
Fenaroli V, Molgora S, Dodaro S, Svelato A, Gesi L, Molidoro G, et al. The childbirth experience: a obstetric and psychological predictors in Italian primiparous women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 jun 21]; 19(1):419. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2561-7.
Utzumi FC, Lacerda MR, Bernardino E, Gomes IM, Aued GK, Sousa SM. Continuity of care and the symbolic interactionism: a possible understanding. Texto & Contexto Enferm. [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 mar 15]; 27(2):e4250016. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-070720180004250016.
Gubrium AC, Fiddian-Green A, Jernigan K, Krause EL. Bodies as evidence: Mapping new terrain for teen pregnancy and parenting. Glob public health. [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 mar 15]; 11(5-6):618‐635. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080 / 17441692.2016.1143522.
Bardin L. Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70; 2011.
Silva RCF, Souza BF, Wernet M, Fabbro MRC, Assalin ACB, Bussadori JCC. The satisfaction of the normal delivery: finding oneself. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 jun 20]; 39:e20170218. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2018.20170218
Villa CM, Flores YR. Experiences Influencing upon the Significance of Obstetric Care in Mexican Nurses. Invest Educ Enferm. [Internet]. 2018; [cited 2019 nov. 15]; 36(1):e12. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v36n1e12.
Reis KC, Ferreira D, Santos I, Brandão TW. Women’s perception of their first labor experience: implications for nursing. Cienc Enferm. [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 mar. 15]; 23(2):45-56. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5935/1676-4285.20120026.
Lansky S, Souza KV, Peixoto ERM, Oliveira BJ, Diniz CSG, Vieira NF et al. Obstetric violence: influences of the Senses of Birth exhibition in pregnant women childbirth experience. Ciênc. Saúde Coletiva. [Internet]. aug. 2019 [cited 2020 mar. 15]; 24(8):2811-2824. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018248.30102017
Possati AB, Prates LA, Cremonese L, Scarton J, Alves CN, Ressel LB. Humanization of childbirth: meanings and perceptions of nurses. Esc Anna Nery Rev Enferm. [Internet] 2017 [cited 2020 mar. 15]. 21(4):e20160366. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-9465-ean-2016-0366.
Brüggemann OM, Ebsen ES, Ebele RR, Batista BD. Possibilities of inclusion of the partner in deliveries in public institutions. Ciênc. Saúde Colet. [Internet] 2016 [cited 2020 mar 15]. 21(8):2555-64. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232015218.16612015.
Queiroz MVO, Menezes GMD, Silva TJP, Brasil EGM, Silva RM. Pregnant teenagers’ group: contributions to prenatal care. Rev Gaúch Enferm. [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 jan 25]. 35(spe) e2016-0029. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2016.esp.2016-0029.
Nunes FC, Caixeta CC, Pinho ES, Souza ACS, Barbosa MA. Group technology in psychosocial care: a dialogue between action-research and permanent health education. Texto & Contexto Enferm. [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 jun 15]; 28: e20180161. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-265X-TCE-2018-0161.
Dias EGG, Ferreira ARM, Martins AMC, Jesus MM, Alves JCS. Efficacy of non-pharmacological methods for pain relief in labor normal of parturition. Enferm Foco (Brasília). [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 mar. 15]; 9(2):35-9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.21675/2357-707X.2018.v9.n2.1398.
Boryri T, Noori NM, Teimouri A, Yaghobinia F. The perception of primiparous mothers of comfortable resources in labor pain: a qualitative study. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 mar.17]; 21(3):239-46. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-9066.180386.
Mascarenhas VHA, Lima TR, Silva FMD, Negreiros FS, Santos JDM, Moura MAP, et al. Scientific evidence on non-pharmacological methods for relief of labor pain. Acta Paul Enferm. [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 jul 29]; 32(3):350-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0194201900048.
Junges CF, Brüggemann OM, Knobel R, Costa R. Support actions undertaken for the woman by companions in public maternity hospitals. Rev Latinoam Enferm. [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 mar.17]; 26:e2994. Available from: http://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2251.2994.
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Array