Resumen
Objetivo: analisar o efeito das intervenções fornecidas por meio de recursos audiovisuais em comparação com a orientação tradicional para melhorar o conhecimento sobre infecções sexualmente transmissíveis entre jovens, adultos e idosos. Método: trata-se de uma revisão sistemática de efetividade, serão incluídas pessoas jovens, adultos e idosos, cuja intervenção foi apoiada em recursos audiovisuais. A estratégia de busca inicial foi construída na MEDLINE e será adaptada para as bases Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS via BVS), Cochrane e Embase. Não haverá delimitação de tempo ou idioma. A seleção e triagem acontecerá por dois revisores independes. Para a análise crítica dos estudos elegíveis será utilizado instrumentos padronizados. Os estudos, independente da qualidade metodológica, passarão pelo processo de síntese e extração de dados. Se possível, os estudos serão agrupados em uma meta-análise estatística. Número de registro na PROSPERO: CRD42022374619.
Citas
McDonall J, Hutchinson AF, Redley B, Livingston PM, Botti M. Usability and feasibility of multimedia interventions for engaging patients in their care in the context of acute recovery: A narrative review. Health Expect. 2019 Dec;22(6):1187-1198. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12957
Li F, Yang CP, Chang CH, Ho CA, Wu CY, Yeh HC, et al. Effect of the Brief Instructional Video Intervention on the Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Int J Med Sci. 2023 Jan 1;20(1):70-78. doi: https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.79433
Rubel KE, Alwani MM, Nwosu OI, Bandali EH, Shipchandler TZ, Illing EA, et al. Understandability and actionability of audiovisual patient education materials on sinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020 Apr;10(4):564-571. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22518
Adam M, Johnston J, Job N, Dronavalli M, Le Roux I, Mbewu N, et al. Evaluation of a community-based mobile video breastfeeding intervention in Khayelitsha, South Africa: The Philani MOVIE cluster-randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2021 Sep 28;18(9):e1003744. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003744
Birdthistle I, Mulwa S, Sarrassat S, Baker V, Khanyile D, O'Donnell D, et al. Effects of a multimedia campaign on HIV self-testing and PrEP outcomes among young people in South Africa: a mixed-methods impact evaluation of 'MTV Shuga Down South'. BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Sep 28;7(4):e007641. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007641
World Health Organization. Sexually transmitted infections (STIs). 2022[cited 2022 Mar 21. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/sexually-transmitted-infections-(stis)
Rowley J, Vander Hoorn S, Korenromp E, Low N, Unemo M, Abu-Raddad LJ, et al. Chlamydia, gonorrhoea, trichomoniasis and syphilis: global prevalence and incidence estimates, 2016. Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Aug 1;97(8):548-562P. doi: https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.18.228486
Kreisel KM, Spicknall IH, Gargano JW, Lewis FMT, Lewis RM, Markowitz LE, et al. Sexually Transmitted Infections Among US Women and Men: Prevalence and Incidence Estimates, 2018. Sex Transm Dis. 2021 Apr 1;48(4):207. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001368
Kim HY, Choe HS, Lee DS, Yoo JM, Lee SJ. Sexual behavior and sexually transmitted infection in the elderly population of South Korea. Investig Clin Urol. 2019 Jul;60(4):244-250. doi: https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.2019.60.4.244
Voyiatzaki C, Venetikou MS, Papageorgiou E, Anthouli-Anagnostopoulou F, Simitzis P, Chaniotis DI, et al. Awareness, Knowledge and Risky Behaviors of Sexually Transmitted Diseases among Young People in Greece. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(19):10022. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910022
Sieving RE, Gewirtz O'Brien JR, Saftner MA, Argo TA. Sexually Transmitted Diseases Among US Adolescents and Young Adults: Patterns, Clinical Considerations, and Prevention. Nurs Clin North Am. 2019 Jun;54(2):207-225. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnur.2019.02.002
Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Aromataris E, Campbell J, Hopp L, Aromataris E, et al. Chapter 3: Systematic reviews of effectiveness. In Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Adelaide: JBI; 2020.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.
Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. the PRISMA-P Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015 Jan 2;350:g7647. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647
Dyussenbayev A. Age Periods Of Human Life. ASSRJ [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2023 jan 1];4(6). Available from: https://journals.scholarpublishing.org/index.php/ASSRJ/article/view/2924
McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:40-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021
Munn Z, Aromataris E, Tufanaru C, Stern C, Porritt K, Farrow J, et al. The development of software to support multiple systematic review types: the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI). Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2019 Mar;17(1):36-43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000152
Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Stephenson M, Aromataris E. Fixed or random effects meta-analysis? Common methodological issues in systematic reviews of effectiveness. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):196-207. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000065
Schünemann H, Brożek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A, editors. Handbook for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations using the GRADE approach [internet]. The GRADE Working Group. 2013 [cited 2022 out 12]. Available from: https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2024 Array