Abstract
Objective: To methodologically analyze the results of research studies that investigated psychometric properties (reliability, responsiveness and validity) of quality of life instruments for individuals with elimination ostomies. Method: A systematic literature review that will be carried out according to the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) initiative, developed in ten stages. The searches will be conducted in national and international databases, with no language or time restrictions. To assess the methodological quality of the studies, the COSMIN risk of bias checklist will be employed by applying the quality criteria for good measuring properties. Finally, the diverse evidence will be compiled by assessing its quality through the GRADE approach. This study is ongoing and its protocol is registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under number CRD42022320642.
References
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Portaria n°400 de 16 de novembro de 2009. Estabelecer Diretrizes Nacionais para a Atenção à Saúde das Pessoas Ostomizadas no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde - SUS, e dá outras providências [Internet]. Diário Oficial da União. Brasília, DF: MS; 2009. Set 16 [citado 2022 Jul 21]. Disponível em: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/sas/2009/prt0400_16_11_2009.html
Miranda LSG, Carvalho AASP, Elisabete PA. Quality of life of ostomized person: relationship with the care provided in stomatherapy nursing consultation. Esc Anna N
ery. 2018; 22(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-9465-EAN-2018-0075
Santos VLCG. Aspectos epidemiológicos dos estomas. Rev Estima [Internet]. 2007 [citado 2022 Set 01]; 5(1):31-38. Disponível em: https://www.revistaestima.com.br/index.php/estima/article/view/207
International Ostomy Association. Charter of ostomates rights. Ottawa: IOA Coordination Committee, 2007. [citado 2022 Jan 16]. Disponível em: https://ostomyeurope.org/ostomates-rights/
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção Especializada em Saúde. Departamento de Atenção Especializada e Temática. Guia de atenção à saúde da pessoa com estomia / Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Atenção Especializada em Saúde, Departamento de Atenção Especializada e Temática [Internet]. Brasília, DF: MS; 2021. Set 16 [citado 2022 Jul 21]. Disponível em: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/guia_atencao_saude_pessoa_estomia.pdf
Marques ADB, Amorim RF, Landim FLP, Moreira TMM, Branco JGO, Morais PB, et al. Body consciousness of people with intestinal stomach: A phenomenological study. Rev Bras Enferm. 2018; 71(2):391-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0666
Paszyńska W, Zborowska K, Czajkowska M, Skrzypulec-Plinta V. Quality of Sex Life in Intestinal Stoma Patients—A Literature Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(3):2660. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032660
Giordano V, Nicolotti M, Corvese F, Vellone E, Alvaro R, Villa G. Describing self-care and its associated variables in ostomy patients. J Adv Nurs. 2020 76(11):2982-2992. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14499
Machado LG, Silva RMD, Siqueira FD, Gilrardon-Perline NMO, Silva MEN, Vasconcellos RO. Challenges of the user against the stoma: between the real and the desired. Nursing [Intetnet]. 2019 [citado 2022 Jul 24];22(253):2962-2966. Disponível em: http://www.revistanursing.com.br/revistas/253/pg70.pdf
Reisdorfer N, Locks MOH, Girondi JBR, Amante LN, Corrêa MS. Processo de transição para vivência com estomias intestinais de eliminação: repercussões na imagem corporal. ESTIMA, Braz. J. Enterostomal Ther. 2019; 1(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.30886/estima.v16.683_pt
World Health Organization. WHOQOL: Measuring Quality of Life [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2020 [citado 2021 Apr 25]. Disponível em: https://www.who.int/healthinfo/survey/whoqol-qualityoflife/en/
Gaspar T, Matos MG. Qualidade de vida em crianças e adolescentes: Versão portuguesa dos instrumentos KidScreen 52. Lisboa: Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana; 2008. [citado 2022 Mai 12]. Disponível em: http://www.codajic.org/sites/default/files/sites/www.codajic.org/files/Qualidade.de_.Vida_.KIDSCREEN.pdf
Bica I, Pinho LM, Silva EM, Aparício G, Duarte J, Costa J, et al. Sociodemographic infl uence in health-related quality of life in adolescents. Acta Paul Enferm. 2020; 33:1-7. https://doi.org/10.37689/acta-ape/2020AO0054
Ayaz-Alkaya, S. Overview of psychosocial problems in individuals with stoma: A review of literature. Int Wound J. 2019; 16: 243– 249. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13018
Diniz IV, Costa IKF, Nascimento JA, Silva IP, Mendonça AEO, Soares MJGO. Factors associated to quality of life in people with intestinal stomas. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2021; 55:1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2020-0377
Beaubrun En Famille Diant L, Sordes F, Chaubard T. Psychological impact of ostomy on the quality of life of colorectal cancer patients: Role of body image, self-esteem and anxiety. Bull Cancer. 2018; 105(6):573-580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulcan.2018.03.005
Konjevoda V, Zelić M, Munjas Samarin R, Petek D. City of Hope Quality of Life-Ostomy Questionnaire Validity and Reliability Assessment on a Croatian Sample. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(3):768. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030768
Del Castilho LNC, Leporace G, Cardinot TM, Levy RA, Oliveira LP. A importância dos questionários para avaliação da qualidade de vida. Rev Hosp Univ Pedro Ernesto [Internet]. 2012 [citado 2022 Jul 24];11:1-9. Disponível em: https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/revistahupe/article/view/8896/6776
Mokkink, L. B., Prinsen, C. A., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., de Vet, H. C., et al. COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) – user manual. [Internet]. 2018 [citado 2022 Ago 10]. Disponível em:
Mokkink LB, de Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Qual Life Res. 2018; 27(5):1171-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4
Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, Alonso J, Patrick DL, de Vet HCW, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018; 27(5):1147-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3
Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015; 349(1):7647. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647
Terwee CB, Jansma EP, Riphagen II, de Vet HC. Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Qual Life Res. 2009; 18(8):1115-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9528-5
Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016; 5(1):210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Array