Clinical-epidemiological profile and clean intermittent catheterization in people with spinal cord injury
HTML
HTML (Español (España))
HTML (Português (Brasil))
EPUB
EPUB (Español (España))
EPUB (Português (Brasil))
PDF
PDF (Español (España))
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Supplementary Files

DUDE (Português (Brasil))
CERTIDÃO FINAL COMITÊ DE ÉTICA (Português (Brasil))
Anexo complementar para resumos de dissertação (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Spinal Cord Injuries
Epidemiologic Measurements
Catheterization
Nursing Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal
Mediciones Epidemiológicas
Cateterismo
Enfermería Traumatismos da Medula Espinal
Medidas em Epidemiologia
Cateterismo
Enfermagem

PlumX Metrics

Abstract

Aim: characterize the socio-demographic and clinical-epidemiological profile of people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Method: this is a cross-sectional, quantitative study involving 80 individuals with SCI. Results: the sample was mostly composed by young individuals, male, with chest injury, victims of traffic accidents. A correlation was found between SCI at lumbar level with firearm accidents, between thoracic injuries and traffic accidents and between cervical lesions and shallow-water diving injuries. Tetraplegia had a greater influence as a risk factor for all complications related to paraplegia, but presented a protective factor for pain syndromes. The reuse of the catheter presented a risk factor for urinary infection, obstruction and bleeding. The use of a lubricated catheter was a protective factor for all the complications studied. Conclusion: the knowledge of the intervening factors to the spinal cord injuries, as well as the identification of the risks of complications, corroborates to a more qualified care.
https://doi.org/10.17665/1676-4285.20175935
HTML
HTML (Español (España))
HTML (Português (Brasil))
EPUB
EPUB (Español (España))
EPUB (Português (Brasil))
PDF
PDF (Español (España))
PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

Håkansson MÅ. Reuse versus singleuse catheters for intermittent catheterization: what is safe and preferred? Review of current status. Spinal Cord.[internet] 2014 [cited 2016 jan 20];52(7):511-6. Avaliable from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24861702

Ministério da Saúde (BR). Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Ações Programáticas Estratégicas. Diretrizes de Atenção à Pessoa com Lesão Medular. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, 2013.Avaliable from: http://sage.saude.gov.br/pdf/viverSemLimite/ler_pdf.php?file=Diretrizes_Lesao_Medular_M

World Health Organization (WHO). Spinal cord injury: as many as 500.000 people suffer each year [Internet]. 2013. Avaliable from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2013/spinal-cord-injury-20131202/en/

World Health Organization (WHO); Bickenbach J, Officer A, Shakespeare T, Groote P (editors). International Perspectives on Spinal Cord Injury. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2015 fev 14] Avaliable from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/94190/1/9789241564663_eng.pdf

Brasil. Resolução nº 466, de 12 de dezembro de 2012. Dispõe sobre diretrizes e normas regulamentadoras de pesquisas envolvendo seres humanos. Diário Oficial da República Federativa do Brasil. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2012. [cited 2015 set 21]. Avaliable from: http://conselho.saude.gov.br/resolucoes/2012/Reso466.pdf