Abstract
Objective: To present the update process of institutional parameters for applying the Perroca Patient Classification System. Method: Applied methodological study conducted by the working group responsible for managing the classification of hospitalized adult patients in a large university hospital located in southern Brazil. The study was carried out between June 2024 and August 2025 in six stages, including the process for revising and updating parameters; internal and external audits of inter-rater agreement; final review and institutional communication with the updated instructions and the related standard operating procedure; and incorporation of the updated parameters into the electronic health record. Results: Although the final classification/stratum agreement between evaluations was satisfactory, the areas of planning and coordination of care, investigation and monitoring, and health education presented negative outcomes. This was addressed in institutional communication to avoid subjectivity in assessment, which, according to the audit results, tends to occur at some level. Conclusion: An institutional guideline set is presented for each of the 36 instrument items used for patient classification. These guidelines do not replace the original scale but support the complexity of the studied hospital and the innovations within contemporary nursing practice.
References
Guardalupe JA, Brum ID, Canto DF do, Telles KCM, Magalhães AMM de, Oliveira JLC de. Comparison of patient classification systems for dimensioning nursing staff. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2023;57:e20230047. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220x-reeusp-2023-0047en
Ayan G, Türkmen E, Uğur E, Akbal E, Sarıtaş B, Erbay Ç, et al. Determination of Nursing Care Times Based on the Perroca Patient Classification Instrument in the Inpatient Oncology Unit: A Mixed Method Study. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2024;40(2):151608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151608
Oliveira JLC de, Cucolo DF, Magalhães AMM de, Perroca MG. Beyond patient classification: the “hidden” face of nursing workload. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2022;56:e20210533. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2021-0533en
Saville C, Griffiths P. Ward staffing guided by a patient classification system: A multi-criteria analysis of “fit” in three acute hospitals. J Nurs Manag. 2021;29(7):2260-2269. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13341
Junttila JK, Haatainen K, Koivu A, Nykänen P. How the reliability and validity of the patient classification system can be ensured in daily nursing work? A follow-up study. J Clin Nurs. 2023;32(13-14):3720-3729. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16559
Ko Y, Park B, Lee H, Kim D. Development of a patient classification system for critical care nursing based on nursing intensity. Int J Nurs Pract. 2023;29(5):e13128. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.13128
Hong KJ, Chung H, Jo YM. Relationships between Alternative Nurse Staffing Level Measurements and Nurses’ Perceptions of Nurse Staffing Level Adequacy, Fatigue, and Care Quality. J Nurs Manag. 2023;2023:6060536. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6060536
Brasil. Conselho Federal de Enfermagem. Parecer Normativo nº 1/2024/COFEN. Parâmetros para o planejamento da força de trabalho da Enfermagem pelo Enfermeiro [Internet]. Brasília (DF): COFEN; 2024 [citado 2025 Ago 13]. Disponível em: https://www.cofen.gov.br/parecer-normativo-no-1-2024-cofen/
Rosa NG da, Vaz TA, Lucena A de F. Nursing workload: use of artificial intelligence to develop a classifier model. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2024;32:e4239. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7131.4239
Batassini É, Veras JC, Ferreira RR, Beghetto MG. Agreement among evaluators in the Nursing Activities Score application. Acta Paul. Enferm. (Online). 2022;35:eAPE03327. http://dx.doi.org/10.37689/acta-ape/2022AO033277
Perroca MG. The new version of a patient classification instrument: assessment of psychometric properties. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69(8):1862-1868. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12038
Brasil. Ministério da Educação. Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. Diretoria de Avaliação. Documento de área: área 20: enfermagem [Internet]. Brasília: CAPES; 2019 [citado 2025 Ago 13]. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/capes/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/enfermagem-pdf
Macedo ABT, Souza SBC de, Funcke LB, Magalhães AMM de, Riboldi C de O. Systematization of an instrument for patient classification in a teaching hospital. REME. 2018;22:e-1152. https://doi.org/10.5935/1415-2762.20180073
Macedo ABT, Riboldi C de O, Silva KS da, Mergen T, Echer IC, Souza SBC de. Validation of parameters to fill in the Perroca’s patient classification system. Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2018;39:e20170241. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2018.20170241
Lima F da C, Ribeiro JB, Denadai S, Nogueira LS, Ferretti-Rebustini RE de L. Influence of neurological severity and degree of dependence of patients after stroke on nursing workload: a retrospective cohort. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2025;59:e20240302. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220x-reeusp-2024-0302en
Moraes RMR, Lara AC de, Remedio EC, Gaiva MAM, Gentilini MM, Oliveira JLC de, et al. Patient classification and nursing staff dimensioning in a pediatric inpatient unit. Cogitare Enferm. (Online). 2023;28:e89190. https://doi.org/10.1590/ce.v28i0.89190
Campos MS de, Cucolo DF, Perroca MG. Repercussions of moving patients on the context of practice: perspectives of the nursing team. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2024;32:e4113. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7042.4113

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing

