Abstract
Objective: To analyze the microbiological profile of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) and short peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVC). Method: A cross-sectional, quantitative study was conducted from April 2023 to October 2024. Removal of PIVC was indicated by signs suggestive of infection, phlebitis, or other clinical changes. Removal of PICC occurred per medical order or upon completion of therapy. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected at the time of device removal. Results: A total of 30 PIVCs were analyzed, 12 of which (40%) showed microbial growth. The most prevalent organisms were Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus. Both were resistant to oxacillin, gentamicin, levofloxacin, clindamycin, erythromycin, and rifampin. Of the 18 PICC tips, 5.55% yielded Staphylococcus capitis. A positive blood culture for Pseudomonas putida occurred in 5.55% of cases without corresponding growth on the catheter tip. Conclusion: Gram-positive bacteria predominated, with a higher occurrence in PIVC. Findings suggest that the patient’s diagnosis influences the identified microbiological profile.
References
Santos LMD, Figueredo IB, Silva CSGE, Catapano UO, Silva BSM, Avelar AFM. Risk factors for infiltration in children and adolescents with peripheral intravenous catheters. Rev Bras Enferm. 2022;75(4):e20210176. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0176
Nickel B, Gorski L, Kleidon T, Kyes A, DeVries M, Keogh S, et al. Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice, 9th Edition. J Infus Nurs. 2024;47(1S Suppl 1):S1–285. https://doi.org/10.1097/nan.0000000000000532
Brasil. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Medidas de Prevenção de Infecção Relacionada à Assistência à Saúde [Internet]. Brasília: Anvisa; 2017 [citado 2025 Jun 24]. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/anvisa/pt-br/centraisdeconteudo/publicacoes/servicosdesaude/publicacoes/caderno-4-medidas-de-prevencao-de-infeccao-relacionada-a-assistencia-a-saude.pdf
Brasil. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Boletim Segurança do Paciente e Qualidade em Serviços de Saúde nº 26: Incidentes Relacionados à Assistência à Saúde – 2021. Resultados das notificações realizadas no Notivisa - Brasil, janeiro a dezembro de 2021 [Internet]. Brasília: Anvisa; 2021 [citado 2025 Out 13]. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/anvisa/pt-br/centraisdeconteudo/publicacoes/servicosdesaude/publicacoes/boletim-2021.pdf
Simões AMN, Vendramim P, Pedreira MLG. Risk factors for peripheral intravenous catheter-related phlebitis in adult patients. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2022;56:e20210398. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220x-reeusp-2021-0398en
Braga LM, Salgueiro-Oliveira A de S, Henriques MAP, Arreguy-Sena C, Albergaria VMP, Parreira PM dos SD. Peripheral venipuncture: comprehension and evaluation of nursing practices. Texto contexto enferm. (Online). 2019;28:e20180018. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-265X-TCE-2018-0018
Barone G, Pittiruti M. Epicutaneo-caval catheters in neonates: New insights and new suggestions from the recent literature. J Vasc Access. 2020;21(6):805-809. https://doi.org/10.1177/1129729819891546
Gonçalves KPO, Sabino KN, Azevedo RVM de, Canhestro MR. Evaluation of maintenance care for peripheral venue catheters through indicators. REME. 2019;23:e-1251. https://doi.org/10.5935/1415-2762.20190099
Pereira RR, Benício GC, Cavalcante SLC de A, Vale AP do, Rocha D dos RA. Use of the peripherally inserted central catheter in adult patients: a perspective for oncology nursing. Rev. enferm. UFPE on line. 2021;15(1):e247934. https://doi.org/10.5205/1981-8963.2021.247934
Rangel RJM, Castro DS, Amorim MHC, Zandonade E, Christoffel MM, Primo CC. Practice of Insertion, Maintenance and Removal of Peripheral Inserted Central Catheter in Neonates. Rev. Pesq.: Cuid. Fundam. 2019;11(2):278-284. https://doi.org/10.9789/2175-5361.2019.v11i2.278-284
Reis N da SP, Santos MFG dos, Leite DC, Gomes HF, Peres EM, Junior EFP. Placement of peripherally inserted central catheters in adolescents by nurses. Cogit. Enferm. (Online). 2019;24:e55639. https://doi.org/10.5380/ce.v24i0.55639
Mittang BT, Stiegler G, Kroll C, Schultz LF. Peripherally inserted central catheter in newborns: removal factors. Revista Baiana Enferm. 2020;34:e38387. http://dx.doi.org/10.18471/rbe.v34.38387
Barrigah-Benissan K, Ory J, Simon C, Loubet P, Martin A, Beregi JP, et al. Clinical factors associated with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) related bloodstream infections: a single centre retrospective cohort. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2023;12(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-023-01209-z
Oplustil CP, Zoccoli CM, Tobouti NR, Sinto SI. Procedimentos básicos em microbiologia clínica. 3. ed. São Paulo: Sarvier; 2010.
Kaya E, Tollapi L, Pastore A, Aringhieri G, Maisetta G, Barnini S, et al. Comparison of methods for the microbiological diagnosis of totally implantable venous access port-related infections. J Med Microbiol. 2020;69(11):1273-1284. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001263
Monteiro GSB, Faramiglio LMAJ, Trindade SSA. Cateter central de inserção periférica (PICC): a atuação do enfermeiro frente os cuidados com o dispositivo em unidade de terapia intensiva adulto [trabalho de conclusão de curso]. Mauá (SP): Faculdade Mauá; 2022.
Cristino JS, Melo JFM, Coelho EO, Oliveira EGS, Bandeira FLR, Costa MI, et al. Perfil microbiológico e de resistência antimicrobiana das infecções de corrente sanguínea em pacientes onco-hematológicos de um centro de referência no Norte do Brasil. Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2023;45(S4):S109-S110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.htct.2023.09.271
Teixeira P da C, Almeida PF, Vieira RPC, Oliveira L da S, Pinto JGM, Mesquita LF, et al. Peripheral venous catheterization: the quality of nursing care in peripheral venous catheter insertion. Glob. Acad. Nurs. J. 2021;2(Sup.3):e180. https://dx.doi.org/10.5935/2675-5602.20200180
Marques PB, Ferreira AP, Carneiro FMC. Perfil bacteriano de cultura de ponta de cateter venoso central. Rev Panamazonica Saude. 2011;2(1):53-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.5123/S2176-62232011000100006
Nascimento RDM, Andrade LG de. Hospital infection and bacterial multi-resistance. Revista Ibero-Americana de Humanidades, Ciências e Educação. 2022;8(3):1289-1299. https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v8i3.4700
Ho CS, Wong CTH, Aung TT, Lakshminarayanan R, Mehta JS, Rauz S, et al. Antimicrobial resistance: a concise update. Lancet Microbe. 2025;6(1):100947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.07.010
Paula CC de, Paludetti LV, Shimoya-Bittencourt W. Avaliação da contaminação microbiana de cateteres venosos usados em pacientes hospitalizados. Rev. Ciênc. Méd. Biol. (Online). 2017;16(2):167-173. https://doi.org/10.9771/cmbio.v16i2.22152
Barros FE, Soares E, Teixeira MLO, Branco EM da SC. Controle de infecções a pacientes em precaução de contato. Rev. enferm. UFPE on line. 2019;13(4):1081-1089. https://doi.org/10.5205/1981-8963-v13i4a238991p1081-1089-2019
Soares CRP. Infecção de corrente sanguínea em pacientes oncológicos com patógenos bacterianos e fúngicos multirresistentes, genes de resistência, mortalidade, tempo e custo hospitalar [tese]. Recife (PE): Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; 2022.
Prates FIF, Silva GF da, Fernandes RA, Cesar JJ. Agravos provocados pela resistência bacteriana: um problema de saúde pública mundial. Braz. J. Surg. Clin. Res. [Internet]. 2020 [citado 2025 Out 13];32(2):131-138. Disponível em: https://www.mastereditora.com.br/periodico/20201004_093315.pdf

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing

