
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SEX, AGE GROUPS, AND HEALTH CARE AMONG OLDER ADULTS IN BRAZIL
Emily da Silva Eberhardt1, Eliane Pinheiro de Morais2, Jack Roberto Silva Fhon3, Idiane Rosset4
1 Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, School of Nursing. Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. ORCID: 0000-0003-2736-5686. E-mail: enfemilyeberhardt@gmail.com
2 Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, School of Nursing. Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. ORCID: 0000-0003-2736-5686 . E-mail: emorais@hcpa.edu.br
3 University of São Paulo, School of Nursing. São Paulo, SP, Brazil. ORCID: 0000-0002-1880-4379. E-mail: betofhon@usp.br
4 Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, School of Nursing. Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. ORCID: 0000-0003-3651-652X. E-mail: idiane.rosset@ufrgs.br
ABSTRACT
Objective: To analyze the association between sex, age groups, and health care among older adults in Brazil in the years 2013 and 2019. Method: A cross-sectional study using public data from the National Health Survey (PNS), which included 11,177 people aged 60 years or older in 2013 and 22,728 in 2019. The Chi-square test was used for the association analysis according to sex and age groups (60 to 69 years, 70 to 79 years, and 80 years or older). Results: Blood pressure and blood glucose monitoring, as well as medical consultations within the last year, were associated with the female sex in both years. Seeking care at a Basic Health Unit (UBS) was significantly associated with the female sex only in 2013. Older adults aged 60 to 69 years showed higher percentages for preventive care indicators, whereas emergency home care was more frequent in the age group of 80 years or older. Conclusion: The female sex and the age group of 60 to 69 years presented the highest percentages of health care. Therefore, interventions and public policies that consider the specificities of health care for the older population are relevant.
Descriptors: Aged; Aging; Health of the Elderly; Chronic Disease; Delivery of Health Care.
|
How to cite: Eberhardt ES, Morais EP, Fhon JRS, Rosset I. Association between sex, age groups, and health care among older adults in Brazil. Online Braz J Nurs. 2026;25(1):e20266956. http://doi.org/10.17665/1676-4285.20266956 |
What is already known:
NCDs represent the main burden of mortality and disability in the country, configuring a major public health problem.
The control and monitoring of blood pressure and blood glucose to prevent complications, as well as vaccination for the prevention of respiratory diseases, are essential for the health of older adults.
There is a gap in knowledge related to the representative analysis of health care in the older population, considering their demographic aspects.
What this article adds:
Female older adults and those in the younger age group presented the highest percentages of health care. The study evidenced significant differences according to sex and age groups, based on a representative analysis of health care in the Brazilian older population.
The study provides insights to support the development of more effective public policies tailored to the needs of the older population, suggesting that actions to encourage the search for health care are indispensable.
INTRODUCTION
The accelerated population aging process, especially in developing countries like Brazil, associated with the epidemiological transition, has resulted in changes in the country's demographic profile, according to data from the latest 2022 census(1). In this context, the increase in Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) stands out, accounting for about 70% of all deaths worldwide(2).
Additionally, older adults may be more susceptible to health complications due to the process of senescence (reduction of physiological function) or senility (when associated with pathological conditions)(3). In this context, health care for the older population is of paramount importance. It is conceptualized as a set of actions and behaviors involved in seeking assistance, preventive monitoring, and the utilization of health services(4). This population is the most affected by NCDs, which are characterized by multiple etiologies, risk factors, a prolonged course, and an association with functional disability(5).
In Brazil, NCDs represent the main burden of premature mortality and disability, and among the most frequent, Systemic Arterial Hypertension (SAH), Diabetes Mellitus (DM), and chronic respiratory diseases stand out, configuring a serious public health problem(5,6). Thus, health care actions, such as the control and monitoring of blood pressure and blood glucose to prevent the worsening of these conditions, as well as vaccination for the prevention of respiratory diseases, become essential(7-8). Furthermore, studies point to significant differences between sexes and age groups, with women and oldest-old individuals (80 years or older) showing the highest prevalence of NCDs. This is related to higher life expectancy and, consequently, a greater need for health care(9-10). Thus, it is essential to consider the specificities of health care for older women, given that sex plays an important role in the aging process(11-12).
The National Health Survey (PNS) constitutes one of the strategies for exploring data regarding the health status of the Brazilian population, enabling the monitoring of the evolution of health indicators and their care, which plays an essential role in the formulation of public policies(13). Such monitoring enables improvements in the effectiveness of interventions for health promotion and disease prevention, aiming to delay inevitable conditions as much as possible and maintain the best quality of life for the population for the longest period possible(14).
In this context, the present study aligns with Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3 of the 2030 Agenda, which aims to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages. Furthermore, it meets the Health Research Priorities Agenda of the Ministry of Health, specifically regarding the topic that recommends the monitoring of non-communicable chronic diseases and the analysis of health indicators for older adults, aiming to support the formulation of more assertive public policies within the scope of the SUS(15).
The gap in knowledge that substantiates this research lies in the scarcity of comparative analyses using population-based national surveys to investigate the search for health care among the older population. Although population aging is widely discussed, knowledge regarding how disparities between sex and age groups relate to the monitoring of health indicators is still limited. In this context, this study may support the planning of nursing interventions aimed at promoting healthy aging and preventing complications arising from NCDs, which requires an equitable approach within the scope of the Unified Health System (SUS). Nurses, especially in Primary Health Care (PHC), act as protagonists in care coordination, making it essential to understand variations in the profile of service utilization to qualify health assistance and management. Given the above, this study is guided by the following research question: How are the associations between sex, age groups, and health care configured among Brazilian older adults in the years 2013 and 2019?
Therefore, this study objectives to analyze the association between sex, age groups, and health care among older adults in Brazil in the years 2013 and 2019.
METHOD
Study design
This is a cross-sectional study that used individual data from the 2013 and 2019 National Health Survey (PNS). The PNS is a population-based household survey, representative of Brazil, conducted by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE) in partnership with the Ministry of Health(13,16).
This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement guidelines.
Population and sample
The study population consisted of Brazilian older adults aged 60 years or older residing in the country in 2013 and 2019. In both the 2013 and 2019 editions, the PNS sample selection was performed through three-stage cluster sampling. In the first stage, the Primary Sampling Units (PSUs) were the census tracts, which were randomly selected. In the second stage, a number of households were randomly selected within each census tract, and, in the third stage, one resident (aged 18 years or older in the 2013 edition and 15 years or older in the 2019 edition) was randomly drawn in each household(13,16).
Expansion factors were calculated by the inverse of the product of the selection probabilities in each stage. The calibration process, including the correction factor for non-response, was performed based on population projections for Brazil and the Federation Units (UF), after weighting the databases by the natural expansion factors. To enable the comparison of data between the 2013 and 2019 PNS, IBGE recalibrated the expansion factors used in the 2013 PNS(13).
The sample calculation was based on the formula for estimating proportions in complex sample designs, considering a 95% confidence level and a maximum sampling error of 2%. The PNS exclusion criteria disregarded special census tracts (such as military barracks and long-term care institutions) and households where it was not possible to conduct the interview after three attempts, ensuring the representativeness of the population residing in private households. The calculated sample size for 2013 was approximately 80,000 households, with data collected in 64,348 households(17). In 2019, the sample calculation was 108,525 households, and information was collected in 94,114 households(13). In 2013, 60,202 adult residents were interviewed individually, and, in 2019, 279,382 individuals over 15 years of age responded to the individual questionnaire(17). In the 2013 and 2019 PNS editions, 23,815 and 43,554 older adults aged 60 years or older were interviewed, respectively(13). The sample for the present study was composed of older adults who participated in each PNS edition and had complete information for the variables of interest, totaling 11,177 individuals in the 2013 PNS and 22,728 in the 2019 PNS.
Data collection
Public domain data were obtained between April and June 2024 from the 2013 and 2019 PNS databases available on the IBGE website (https://www.ibge.gov.br/). The data were organized into an electronic spreadsheet (Excel) according to the variables of interest for subsequent export to the statistical program Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS®) for Windows, version 20.0. In this software, variables were grouped to enable the necessary analyses.
For data collection, the following sociodemographic variables were considered: sex, age, marital status, color or race, highest level of education, and per capita household income. The following health care variables were also considered: receipt of the influenza vaccine within the last year; the last time blood pressure was measured; the last time a blood test was performed to measure blood glucose; the last medical consultation; the health service usually sought in case of illness or need for care; and the occurrence of urgent or emergency care at home within the last year.
Data analysis
Variables were analyzed according to sex (female and male) and age groups (60 to 69 years, 70 to 79 years, and 80 years or older). Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS®) for Windows, version 20.0, utilizing the complex samples module.
Variables were presented using relative frequencies (%) and confidence intervals (CI). The association between sociodemographic and health care variables was verified using Pearson's Chi-square test. Associations were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05. Due to the sample complexity, the weighting variables for the primary sampling unit (PSU_PNS), individual weight (V00291), and stratum (V0024) were utilized. The proportions of the variables and their respective 95%CIs were estimated according to the survey year.
Ethical considerations
This study was exempt from evaluation by the Research Ethics Committee since it analyzed public domain data without participant identification, in compliance with the ethical guidelines of Resolution No. 466/12 of the National Health Council (CNS) for research involving human beings. The PNS project obtained approval from the National Research Ethics Commission (CONEP) under Opinion No. 328,159 (2013 edition) and Opinion No. 3,529,376 (2019 edition). All interviewees were previously consulted, received clarifications, and agreed to participate in the study by signing the Informed Consent Form (ICF). Furthermore, the PNS complies with CNS Resolution No. 196/96, ensuring voluntariness, anonymity, and the possibility of withdrawal at any time for all participants.
RESULTS
Table 1 details the sociodemographic profile of the studied population. The data reveal a scenario of feminization of aging and a predominance of young-old individuals (60 to 69 years), White, and married, in both analyzed periods. Persistent socioeconomic vulnerability is also observed, evidenced by low education levels, with more than half of the sample having incomplete primary education or no instruction, and by the concentration of per capita household income at levels close to the minimum wage in force at the times of data collection.
Table 1 – Sociodemographic characteristics of Brazilian older adults regarding the years 2013 (n = 11,177) and 2019 (n = 22,728). Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, 2013 and 2019
|
Variables |
2013 % (95% CI) |
2019 % (95% CI) |
|
Sex |
|
|
|
Female |
56.4 (54.8–57.9) |
56.7 (55.6–57.7) |
|
Male |
43.6 (42.1–45.2) |
43.3 (42.3–44.4) |
|
Age |
69.7 ± 7.9 |
70.0 ± 8.0 |
|
60–69 years |
56.6 (54.9–58.2) |
56.3 (55.2–57.4) |
|
70–79 years |
29.8 (28.4–31.3) |
30.1 (29.2–31.1) |
|
|
13.3 (12.6–14.7) |
13.6 (12.8–14.3) |
|
Marital Status |
|
|
|
Married |
53.5 (51.9–55.1) |
50.7 (49.5–51.8) |
|
Widowed |
26.6 (25.3–27.9) |
25.1 (24.1–26.0) |
|
Single |
12.6 (11.3–13.4) |
15.3 (14.5–16.1) |
|
Divorced |
7.7 (6.7–8.8) |
9.0 (8.5–9.6) |
|
Race/Color |
|
|
|
White |
53.8 (52.1–55.4) |
50.5 (49.4–51.7) |
|
Brown (Mixed-race) |
35.6 (34.0–37.1) |
37.4 (36.3–38.5) |
|
Black |
9.2 (8.3–10.2) |
10.3 (9.6–11.0) |
|
Asian |
1.2 (0.9–1.6) |
1.3 (1.0–1.6) |
|
Indigenous |
0.3 (0.2–0.4) |
0.5 (0.4–0.7) |
|
Educational Level |
|
|
|
No formal education |
22.7 (21.4–24.0) |
16.8 (16.0–17.7) |
|
Incomplete elementary education |
48.0 (46.3–49.7) |
46.5 (45.3–47.6) |
|
Complete elementary education / Incomplete high school |
8.1 (7.0–9.3) |
9.5 (8.7–10.5) |
|
Complete high school / Incomplete higher education |
11.8 (10.8–13.2) |
15.9 (14.8–17.1) |
|
Complete higher education |
9.4 (8.2–10.7) |
11.3 (10.5–12.1) |
|
Per Capita Income** |
1,466.89 ± 3,799.21 |
1,929.41 ± 3,129.21 |
*Mean ± standard deviation.
**The Brazilian minimum wage in 2013 was R$ 678.00 and in 2019 it was R$ 998.00.
Secondary data from the National Health Survey (PNS) of 2013 and 2019.
Source: prepared by the authors, 2024.
Table 2 presents the evolution of health care among older adults in 2013 and 2019. It was observed that 83.2% of the older adults interviewed in 2013 had their blood pressure checked less than six months prior, while in 2019 this percentage increased to 84.2%. The percentage of older adults who had never measured their blood pressure decreased from 0.9% to 0.7% in this period. Regarding blood glucose control, 55.3% and 58.8% of older adults measured it less than six months prior, in 2013 and 2019, respectively. It was evidenced that 5.2% of older adults had never measured their blood glucose in 2013, and, in 2019, this percentage decreased to 2.4%.
Regarding influenza vaccination in the last year, 72.6% of the interviewed older adults were vaccinated in 2013 and 71.9% in 2019. A considerable number of older adults consulted a physician in the last 12 months, with percentages of 84.4% in 2013 and 89.3% in 2019. An expressive percentage of older adults who sought Basic Health Units (UBS) when they needed health care stands out, being 46.1% in 2013 and 46.8% in 2019.
Table 2 – Health care among Brazilian older adults regarding the years 2013 (n = 11,177) and 2019 (n = 22,728). Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, 2013 and 2019
|
Variables |
2013 % (95% CI) |
2019 % (95% CI) |
|
Last time blood pressure was measured |
|
|
|
Less than 6 months ago |
83.2 (82.0–84.3) |
84.2 (83.4–85.0) |
|
Between 6 months and less than 1 year ago |
8.1 (7.2–9.0) |
8.4 (7.9–9.0) |
|
Between 1 year and less than 2 years ago |
4.4 (3.8–5.1) |
3.7 (3.3–4.1) |
|
Two years ago or more |
3.5 (2.9–4.2) |
3.0 (2.6–3.6) |
|
Never had blood pressure measured |
0.9 (0.7–1.2) |
0.7 (0.5–0.9) |
|
Last time blood glucose was measured |
|
|
|
Less than 6 months ago |
55.3 (53.7–56.8) |
58.8 (57.8–59.8) |
|
Between 6 months and less than 1 year ago |
17.2 (16.0–18.5) |
18.9 (18.1–19.8) |
|
Between 1 year and less than 2 years ago |
10.8 (9.9–11.8) |
10.0 (9.4–10.7) |
|
Two years ago or more |
11.4 (10.3–12.9) |
9.8 (8.9–10.8) |
|
Never had blood glucose measured |
5.2 (4.5–5.9) |
2.4 (2.1–2.8) |
|
Received influenza vaccination in the previous 12 months |
72.6 (71.2–74.0) |
71.9 (70.9–72.9) |
|
Last medical consultation |
|
|
|
Within the previous 12 months |
84.4 (83.2–85.5) |
89.3 (88.6–89.9) |
|
Between 1 year and less than 2 years ago |
6.5 (5.8–7.3) |
5.4 (4.9–5.8) |
|
Two years ago or more |
8.5 (7.3–9.9) |
5.1 (4.6–5.8) |
|
Never consulted a physician |
0.6 (0.4–0.9) |
0.3 (0.2–0.3) |
|
Received urgent or emergency care at home in the previous 12 months |
2.8 (2.4–3.4) |
3.9 (3.5–4.4) |
|
Usual source of care when healthcare is needed |
|
|
|
Primary Health Care Unit |
46.1 (43.9–48.3) |
46.8 (45.3–48.3) |
|
Urgent or emergency care services |
13.7 (11.3–16.6) |
14.1 (12.7–15.8) |
|
Private medical practice |
24.9 (23.2–26.7) |
28.0 (26.7–29.3) |
|
Other service |
15.4 (12.7–18.6) |
11.1 (9.6–12.7) |
Secondary data from the National Health Survey (PNS) of 2013 and 2019.
Source: prepared by the authors, 2024.
Table 3 presents the association between older adults' health care and sex in 2013 and 2019. Women showed the highest percentages of health care in the analyzed years. A slight reduction was observed in the percentage of older women who usually sought the UBS when they needed health care, while there was an increase in seeking care among males in the analyzed period.
Variables related to blood pressure checking, blood glucose measurement, and medical consultation showed a statistically significant association with sex in the years 2013 and 2019, with higher proportions in the female sex. The variable regarding the habit of seeking the UBS, in turn, demonstrated a significant association only in 2013, with higher prevalence among the female sex
Table 3 – Association of health care of Brazilian older adults in relation to sex in 2013 (n = 11,177) and 2019 (n = 22,728). Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, 2013 and 2019
|
Variables |
2013 Female % (95% CI) |
2013 Male % (95% CI) |
p* |
2019 Female % (95% CI) |
2019 Male % (95% CI) |
p* |
|
Blood pressure measured within the previous 6 months |
48.6 (47.1–50.2) |
34.6 (33.1–36.1) |
<0.001 |
49.1 (48.0–50.2) |
35.1 (34.1–36.1) |
<0.001 |
|
Blood glucose measured within the previous 6 months |
34.1 (32.7–35.6) |
21.2 (19.9–22.6) |
<0.001 |
35.2 (34.1–36.2) |
23.6 (22.8–24.5) |
<0.001 |
|
Received influenza vaccination in the previous 12 months |
41.2 (39.6–42.8) |
34.5 (30.0–32.9) |
0.569 |
41.2 (40.1–42.3) |
30.8 (29.8–31.7) |
0.093 |
|
Consulted a physician within the previous 12 months |
50.0 (48.4–51.5) |
34.4 (32.9–36.0) |
<0.001 |
52.3 (51.2–53.4) |
37.0 (35.9–38.0) |
<0.001 |
|
Received urgent or emergency care at home within the previous 12 months |
2.7 (2.2–3.3) |
3.0 (2.2–4.1) |
0.633 |
2.3 (1.9–2.6) |
1.6 (1.4–1.9) |
0.648 |
|
Usually seeks care at a Primary Health Care Unit when healthcare is needed |
26.7 (25.0–28.4) |
19.4 (17.9–21.1) |
0.043 |
26.4 (25.2–27.6) |
20.4 (19.4–21.5) |
0.421 |
*Chi-square test.
**The sum of female and male responses equals the total percentage that gave an affirmative answer to the variable in question.
Secondary data from the National Health Survey (PNS) of 2013 and 2019.
Source: prepared by the authors, 2024.
Table 4 presents the association between health care and age groups in 2013 and 2019. It was observed that older adults aged 60 to 69 years presented the highest percentages of health care. The variables significantly associated with age groups in 2013 were urgent and emergency care at home and the habit of seeking the UBS when needing health care. In 2019, all variables presented a statistically significant association.
Table 4 – Association of the proportion of Brazilian older adults who performed health care in relation to age groups in 2013 (n = 11,177) and 2019 (n = 22,728). Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, 2013 and 2019
|
Health care |
2013 |
p* |
2019 |
p* |
|
|
60–69 years % (95% CI) |
70–79 years % (95% CI) |
80 years or older % (95% CI) |
|
|
Had blood pressure measured within the last 6 months |
46.7 (45.1–48.3) |
25.3 (23.9–26.8) |
11.2 (10.2–12.2) |
0.596 |
|
Had blood glucose measured within the last 6 months |
30.2 (28.8–31.7) |
17.3 (16.2–18.5) |
7.8 (7.0–8.7) |
0.214 |
|
Received an influenza vaccination within the last 12 months |
40.5 (39.0–42.0) |
22.3 (21.0–23.7) |
9.8 (8.9–10.7) |
0.133 |
|
Had a medical consultation within the last 12 months |
47.3 (45.7–49.0) |
25.4 (24.0–26.8) |
11.7 (10.8–12.7) |
0.134 |
|
Received urgent or emergency care at home within the last 12 months |
1.9 (1.3–2.6) |
3.3 (2.4–4.5) |
5.9 (4.2–8.1) |
<0.001 |
|
Usually seeks care at a Primary Health Care Unit when needing health care |
|
|
|
|
*Chi-square test.
** The sum of the age groups equals the total percentage that had an affirmative response to the variable in question.
Secondary data from the National Health Survey (PNS) of 2013 and 2019.
Source: prepared by the authors, 2024.
DISCUSSION
This study presents innovative and representative data on the association between health care and the sociodemographic profile of older adults in Brazil across two distinct periods. These findings are foundational for the control and prevention of both acute respiratory diseases and NCDs, according to sex and age group. An advancement in access to and utilization of health services was observed, along with significant disparities between sexes and age cohorts.
Corroborating the literature, women represented more than half of the studied population, which highlights the phenomenon of the feminization of aging(11-12). Given this demographic trend, it is imperative that policymakers and health professionals develop specific strategies and programs that meet the demands and particularities of older women's health(11). Furthermore, understanding the epidemiological profile of this population is essential for effective public policy planning(18). It was found that more than half of the Brazilian older adults belonged to the younger group (60 to 69 years). Thus, it becomes essential to offer adequate health actions to maximize life expectancy with the greatest possible independence and autonomy. Public support strategies directed at both young-old and oldest-old individuals—the latter frequently with moderate levels of dependency—could prolong the period of active and autonomous life(19-20). The increase in the number of older adults across the surveys reflects population aging resulting from the demographic transition process in the country(21).
A significant change was also observed in the educational profile of the participants between the analyzed periods, characterized by a reduction in the proportion of low education levels and an increase in individuals with complete secondary education. This evolution is decisive, as higher educational attainment correlates with seeking care and a greater appropriation of preventive care(22). However, for the portion that still exhibits low education, it is necessary to stimulate functional literacy through initiatives such as Youth and Adult Education (EJA). In this way, education can act as a tool for equity in access to services and the emancipation of the subject, making it essential to consider social and gender disparities. In this context, nurses play a key role in the health literacy of older adults, contributing significantly to the expansion of self-care and therapeutic adherence(23).
Despite the expansion of SUS coverage in Brazil, structural and organizational gaps persist, heavily affecting the most vulnerable groups. International evidence suggests that public policies aimed at active aging must consider the sociocultural and economic specificities of the older population, serving as a basis for interventions that respect the diversity of the Brazilian scenario(24-25).
An increase in seeking most health actions was evidenced in the analyzed years, with an emphasis on blood pressure checking and medical consultations. This increment can be attributed to a convergence of socioeconomic factors, such as increased income and the strengthening of sectoral public policies(6). However, vertical challenges remain regarding health education and preventive awareness, especially concerning immunizations, active aging, and the expansion of the Health Care Network (RAS)(6,26).
The literature indicates that the search for assistance among older adults results from a multifactorial combination, originating from perceived needs and being limited by the availability of resources(27). In this regard, it is urgent to make efforts to promote health education and the early search for care, aiming at the prevention, control, and monitoring of NCDs(6,28). Expanding access impacts not only the quality of life of older adults but also reduces the physical and emotional burden on families, who usually assume solitary support during clinical exacerbations of these chronic conditions(29). It is imperative to strengthen PHC so that follow-up and active tracing are effective, linking actions to local sociodemographic characteristics, such as gender and age asymmetries(30).
A slight reduction in influenza vaccine coverage within the 12 months preceding data collection was observed. This decline in immunization is concerning and can be associated with vaccine hesitancy and misinformation, phenomena that intensified in the post-pandemic scenario (subsequent to the analyzed period). Studies on COVID-19 vaccination in older adults indicate that, although initial adherence was significant, the maintenance of booster doses faces similar barriers rooted in distrust and fear(31). The drop in vaccine coverage results in a higher risk of infectious complications, hospitalizations, and mortality from preventable causes, burdening the public health system. Therefore, robust awareness strategies regarding the relevance of booster doses against respiratory viruses in this population are necessary(32).
Among women, the percentage of influenza vaccination remained stable, whereas there was a decline among men. In the analysis by age groups, a reduction was recorded among older adults aged 60 to 69 years and a slight increase among those aged 80 years or older. It is highlighted that the older population is one of the most affected by respiratory conditions, with pneumonia and influenza being frequent causes of death. Interventions by health services are key to mitigating the impact of this public health problem, focusing on awareness about annual immunization(33-34). The importance of vaccine incentives to achieve healthy aging is emphasized, in addition to the development of more effective vaccines consistent with the immunological particularities of this age group(34).
It was evidenced that a significant portion of older adults used the Primary Healthcare Unit as a reference service. Corroborating this trend, a national investigation highlighted a notable increase in access to and utilization of PHC and urgent or emergency services by Brazilian older adults from 2008 to 2019(35). Nurses in PHC assume a protagonist role in this scenario; their performance transcends isolated campaigns and encompasses gerontological nursing consultations, frailty screening, and the implementation of longitudinal care plans. These actions ensure systemic follow-up for older adults and promote supported self-care for NCDs(36).
When analyzing the care profile according to sex and age group, it was observed that women and younger older adults presented the highest rates of seeking assistance. This result aligns with a study conducted in China with individuals aged 60 years or older, which demonstrated that these segments were more likely to utilize outpatient health services(27).
Studies show that women tend to manifest greater concern for their own health, leading them to attend health services more regularly(37-39). In contrast, the literature on men's health reveals that self-care is not a practice culturally associated with the male population(40-41). The traditional model of masculinity negatively impacts men's health. Among the factors hindering the search for care, the incompatibility between the operating hours of health units and work schedules stands out, alongside the fear of unemployment, since men are still culturally viewed as family providers, even after the age of 60(42).
International research ratifies this pattern of inequality, identifying that older women access preventive services more often, while men present a higher prevalence of hospitalizations and lower adherence to screening and disease prevention(43-44). Nonetheless, this study identified a trend of increased care-seeking behaviors among men. Such disparities may also reflect the scarcity of comprehensive, large-scale investigations on the subject. It can be inferred, therefore, that there is an ongoing transition in male behavior regarding their own health, although it is still incipient.
Regarding age groups, younger older adults showed a greater search for care, which can be explained by ease of mobility and the early diagnosis of NCDs. On the other hand, oldest-old individuals (80 years or older) exhibit a higher risk of frailty, as described in the literature(45-47). This group faces barriers to continuous follow-up, such as physical limitations for displacement, cognitive decline, and dependency on a companion, factors that often preclude regular attendance at the health unit(45-47).
Moreover, an increase in urgent or emergency home care was evidenced, reflecting the pressing need for the consolidation of home care services. The performance of nurses in PHC is essential for planning effective home visits and health promotion actions that integrate the intersectionality of gender and age, with a focus on older adults in frail situations(12,48).
Within the scope of PHC, nurses consolidate themselves as protagonist professionals in the coordination of care for older adults. Their clinical practice transcends health education actions and awareness for chronic disease control, encompassing leadership in complex case management and the implementation of evidence-based gerontological nursing consultations(49). The findings of this study reinforce the need for nursing performance in the early identification of vulnerabilities, especially among the oldest-old and men, utilizing risk stratification tools to guide equitable care planning. Thus, this investigation provides resources for managing interventions that consider gender and age disparities, qualifying therapeutic adherence and support for family caregivers(50).
Among the limitations of the study, the restricted number of care predictor variables is noted, in addition to those inherent to secondary data analysis, such as the impossibility of controlling the collection process, given that self-reported data may introduce information bias. However, the methodological rigor of the National Health Survey confers robustness and representativeness to the results for the Brazilian older population, providing relevant evidence for the improvement of public policies. Future research is needed to evaluate the intersectionality of gender with other social determinants, such as race/color, income, and education, which can exacerbate inequalities in health access.
CONCLUSION
The study fulfilled its objective by demonstrating that the variables of sex and age group present significant associations with health care among older adults. Blood pressure and blood glucose monitoring, as well as medical consultations within the last year, remained associated with the female sex and the 60-to-69-year age group in both analyzed years. The utilization of the UBS as a reference service showed a statistical association with the female sex specifically in the year 2013, whereas urgent home care was associated with older adults aged 80 years or older in both periods.
The results have direct applicability across the dimensions of nursing practice: in clinical care, they direct the active tracing of oldest-old men for preventive and monitoring actions; in management, they guide the reorganization of institutional workflows, emphasizing PHC as the coordinator of care and director of the network to ensure the equitable monitoring of NCDs; in education, they reinforce the need to address gender and age inequities, as well as gerontology, in professional training; and in research, they establish solid foundations for longitudinal and intervention-based investigations.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
1. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Censo Demográfico 2022: População e Domicílios - Primeiros Resultados [Internet]. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2023 [cited 2026 Apr 29]. Available from: https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/sociais/populacao/22827-censo-demografico-2022.html
2. World Health Organization. Fact sheets. Noncommunicable diseases [Internet]. Genebra: WHO; 2023 [cited 2024 Sep 19]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases
3. Oliveira MCC, Pereira KD, Oliveira MAC, Pinto MATC, Lucena JMC, Leite M, et al. Importância da atenção e promoção à saúde frente ao processo de cuidado da pessoa idosa. Braz J Health Rev. 2021;4(1):1151-1163. https://doi.org/10.34119/bjhrv4n1-102
4. Gabrani J, Schindler C, Wyss K. Health seeking behavior among adults and elderly with chronic health condition(s) in Albania. Front Public Health. 2021;9:616014. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.616014. PMID: 33796494
5. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Plano de Ações Estratégicas para o Enfrentamento das Doenças Crônicas e Agravos não Transmissíveis no Brasil 2021-2030 [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2021 [cited 2024 Sep 19]. Available from: https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/publicacoes/publicacoes-svs/doencas-cronicas-nao-transmissiveis-dcnt/09-plano-de-dant-2022_2030.pdf
6. Eberhardt E, Kawalende SCN, Rosset I. Most prevalent morbidities among older Brazilian adults according to sex, age groups, and major regions. Rev Bras Geriatr Gerontol. 2026;29:e250145. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562026029.250145.en
7. Bacurau AG de M, Francisco PMSB. Chronic diseases in older people and influenza vaccination: the guidance of health professionals and the role of the media. Rev Bras Med Fam Comunidade. 2022;17(44):2819. https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc17(44)2819
8. Queiroz RT, Pereira TS, Nascimento LDC, Gomes BGA, Dias BAC. O processo educativo voltado para hipertensão arterial sistêmica e diabetes mellitus para a promoção de saúde de idosos da unidade municipal de saúde do Benguí II, Belém, Pará: relato de experiência. CPAqv J. 2021;13. https://doi.org/10.36692/v13n3-5
9. Chowdhury SR, Das DC, Sunna TC, Beyene J, Hossain A. Global and regional prevalence of multimorbidity in the adult population in community settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine. 2023;57:101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101860. PMID: 36864977
10. Santos LB, Rocha SV, Lessa RS, Vilela ABA. Multimorbidade em idosos de um município do nordeste brasileiro: prevalência e fatores associados. Rev Salud Publica. 2023;21:1-7. https://doi.org/10.15446/rsap.V21n5.77775
11. Deng J, Kong L, Li W. Gender disparities in healthy ageing in China: current status and future prospects. Front Public Health. 2025;13:1587922. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1587922. PMID: 40475201
12. Predebon ML, Ramos G, Pizzol FLFD, Soares JV, Paskulin LMG, Rosset I. Life satisfaction and health self-assessment of older adults assisted through home care. Rev Bras Enferm. 2021;74:e20200357. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0357. PMID: 33759941
13. Stopa SR, Szwarcwald CL, Oliveira MMD, Gouvea EDCDP, Vieira MLFP, Freitas MPSD, et al. National Health Survey 2019: history, methods and perspectives. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2020;29:e2020315. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-49742020000500004
14. Oliveira MCC, Pereira KD, Oliveira MAC, Pinto MATC, Lucena JMC, Leite M, et al. Importância da atenção e promoção à saúde frente ao processo de cuidado da pessoa idosa. Braz J Health Rev. 2021;4:1151-1163. https://doi.org/10.34119/bjhrv4n1-102
15. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Agenda de Prioridades de Pesquisa do Ministério da Saúde [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2018 [cited 2026 May 07]. Available from: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/agenda_prioridades_pesquisa_ms.pdf
16. Souza Júnior PRB, Freitas MPS, Antonaci GA, Szwarcwald CL. Comparison of sampling designs from the two editions of the Brazilian National Health Survey, 2013 and 2019. Cad Saude Publica. 2022;38(4):e00164321. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00164321. PMID: 35857956
17. Souza-Junior PRBD, Freitas MPSD, Antonaci GDA, Szwarcwald CL. Sampling design for the national health survey, 2013. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2014;24:207-216. https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742015000200003
18. Mrejen M, Nunes L, Giacomin K. Socioeconomic inequalities in health and healthcare utilization among the elderly in Brazil: results from the 2019 National Health Survey. Public Health. 2024;226:165-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2023.11.015. PMID: 38071949
19. Macinko J, Beltrán-Sánchez H, Mambrini JVM, Lima-Costa MF. Socioeconomic, disease burden, physical functioning, psychosocial, and environmental factors associated with mortality among older adults: the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSI-Brazil). J Aging Health. 2024;36(1-2):25-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643231171184. PMID: 37078416
20. Chaimowicz F, Chaimowicz G de F. O envelhecimento populacional brasileiro. Pista [Internet] 2022 [cited 2024 Sep 19];4(2):6-26. Available from: https://periodicos.pucminas.br/pista/article/view/29830
21. Ma J, Chen Q, Chen X, Fan J, Li X, Wang H. An inevitably ageing world: analysis on the evolutionary pattern of age structure in 200 countries. R Soc Open Sci. 2025;12(4):241381. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.241988. PMID: 40242332
22. Hamid S, Beko ZW, Mekonnen HS, Salih MH. Proportion and factors influencing healthcare-seeking behavior among older people in Motta town, East Gojjam: a community-based cross-sectional study, Ethiopia, 2023. BMC Public Health. 2024;24:2092. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19603-6. PMID: 39095801
23. Hu H, Wang J, Si J. Inequalities in successful aging among the older adults in China: A decomposition study based on a gender perspective. J Women Aging. 2025;37(3):171-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/08952841.2025.2478680. PMID: 40111851
24. Tamayo Giraldo FJ, Baracaldo Pinzón LI, Valencia Almonacid SL, Ortega Lenis D, Giraldo Cárdenas MM. Índice de envejecimiento activo en Colombia: análisis basado en la Encuesta Nacional de Salud, Bienestar y Envejecimiento (SABE Colombia 2015). Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2021;45:e69. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2021.69
25. Montoya-Arce BJ, Macías-Cuesta HJ. Impacto de las enfermedades crónicas en la vejez en el Estado de México: situación actual e implicaciones para una política pública. Pap Poblac. 2023;29(115):61-96. https://doi.org/10.22185/24487147.2023.115.04
26. Sulzbach CC, Weiller TH, Dallepiane LB. Acesso à Atenção Primária à Saúde de longevos: perspectiva de profissionais da Saúde da Família de um município do Rio Grande do Sul. Cad Saude Colet. 2020;28(3):373-380. https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-462X202028030158
27. Zeng Y, Wan Y, Yuan Z, Fang Y. Healthcare-seeking behavior among Chinese older adults: patterns and predictive factors. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(6):2969. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062969. PMID: 33799366
28. Oche OM, Ezenwoko AZ, Danmadami AM, Ahmadu NS, Salihu A, Muhammad U. Assessment of health-seeking behaviour of the elderly in a rural community of Sokoto State, Nigeria. Cent Afr J Public Health. 2024;10(1):30-41. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cajph.20241001.15
29. Mizumoto J, Fujikawa H, Izumiya M, Eto M. Family caregiver facilitating access to healthcare and providing daily support for older patients: A descriptive study. J Gen Fam Med. 2025;26:585-590. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.70064. PMID: 41195043
30. Gabrani J, Schindler C, Wyss K. Health seeking behavior among adults and elderly with chronic health condition (s) in Albania. Front Public Health. 2021;9:616014. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.616014. PMID: 33796494
31. Imran M, Ahmed Z, Ishaqui AA, Bafail D, Ahmad SA, Farooq J, et al. Acceptance, hesitancy, and concerns regarding COVID-19 booster dose among the elderly population: a cross-sectional study. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2023;17(11):1529-1536. https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.17710. PMID: 38064396
32. Lopes GCD, Paixão BS de P, Souza BR de, Silva UP da, Farias WS de. A efetividade das estratégias de vacinação para idosos no Brasil: revisão integrativa. Rev GeSec. 2024;15(1):1-19. https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v15i1.3313
33. Arruda EL, Silva GSS da. Saúde e impacto no Brasil: a cobertura vacinal contra influenza no estado do Goiás em idosos e a sua relação sobre internação e óbitos por pneumonia nos últimos 10 anos. Stud Health Sci. 2024;5(4):e9390. https://doi.org/10.54022/shsv5n4-004
34. Alexandrino A, Xavier BL de Q, Oliveira FB de, Santos ABMV dos, Quirino AL, Andrade FB de. Morbimortalidade por doenças do aparelho respiratório no Brasil: um estudo ecológico. Rev Cienc Plural. 2022;8:1-21. https://doi.org/10.21680/2446-7286.2022v8n2ID25243
35. Cesário VAC, Santos MMD, Mendes TCDO, Souza Júnior PRBD, Lima KCD. Tendências de acesso e utilização dos serviços de saúde na APS entre idosos no Brasil nos anos 2008, 2013 e 2019. Cienc Saude Colet. 2021;26:4033-4044. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232021269.08962021
36. Rahmat R, Haroen H, Juniarti N, Sari SP, Rinawan FR. Effectiveness of community nurse-led intervention in managing older adults with multimorbidity: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025;18:6373-6389. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S548950. PMID: 41064332
37. Jadhav SB, Kadarkar KS, Mujumdar HN. Community Based Appraisal of Healthcare Service Utilisation and Determinants of Health Seeking Behaviour among the Elderly Population of Rural Western Maharashtra. J Clin Diagn Res. 2022;16(3):LC06-LC10. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/52681.16105
38. Mohan DSR, Jawahir S, Manual A, Mutalib NWA, Noh SNM, Ab Rahim I, et al. Gender differences in healthcare-seeking behaviour: insights from the National Health and Morbidity Survey 2019. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025;25:900. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13020-0. PMID: 40611153
39. Barbosa RVM, Egypto PV, Monteiro ACS, Ramos LCM, Costa LH da S. Desafios do Envelhecimento Populacional para o Sistema de Saúde. Braz J Implantol Health Sci. 2025;7(8): 377–388. https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2025v7n8p377-388
40. Dias EG, Barbosa ET, Freitas SRS, Campos LM, Caldeira MB. Comportamentos de saúde e fatores associados à procura dos homens pelo Serviço Primário de Saúde. Espac Saude. 2022;23:e839. https://doi.org/10.22421/1517-7130/es.2022v23.e839
41. Abdullah NN, Arsat MHM, Aziz NRA, Al-Kubaisy W. Men Health Seeking Behaviour: A literature review. Environ Behav Proc J. 2022;7(20):247-254. https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v7i20.3484
42. França AMB, Filho Casado J, Silva KRB, Oliveira, MM de, Bento TMA. Saúde do homem na atenção básica: fatores que levam os homens a não procurar a assistência de saúde. Cad Cienc Biol Saude [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 Sep 19];6(3):191-199. Available from: https://periodicos.grupotiradentes.com/cdgsaude/article/view/9260
43. Barr E, Popkin R, Roodzant E, Jaworski B, Temkin SM. Gender as a social and structural variable: research perspectives from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Transl Behav Med. 2024;14(1):13-22. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibad014. PMID: 37074158
44. Watkinson RE, Sutton M, Turner AJ. Ethnic inequalities in health-related quality of life among older adults in England: secondary analysis of a national cross-sectional survey. Lancet Public Health. 2021;6(3):e145-e154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30287-5. PMID: 33516278
45. Yuan X, Chen S, Sun C, Yuwen L. A novel early diagnostic framework for chronic diseases with class imbalance. Sci Rep. 2022;12:8614. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12574-x. PMID: 35597855
46. Rashmi R, Mohanty SK. Examining chronic disease onset across varying age groups of Indian adults using competing risk analysis. Sci Rep. 2023;13:5848. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32861-5. PMID: 37037884
47. Mohanty SK, Abhilasha, Mishra RS, Upadhyay AK, O’Donnell O, Maurer J. Sociodemographic and geographic inequalities in diagnosis and treatment of older adults’ chronic conditions in India: a nationally representative population-based study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09318-6. PMID: 37013518
48. Ramos G, Predebon ML, Dal Pizzol FL, Santos NO, Paskulin LMG, Tanaka AKSR, et al. Fragilidade e funcionalidade familiar de idosos da Atenção Domiciliar: estudo transversal analítico. Acta Paul Enferm. 2022;35:eAPE039009234. https://doi.org/10.37689/acta-ape/2022AO009234
49. Dimitriadou I, Sini E, Šteinmiller J, Saridi M, Lundberg A, Häger M, et al. Comprehensive geriatric health assessment core competencies and skills for primary care nurses: a scoping review. Geriatrics. 2025;10(2):48. https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics10020048. PMID: 40126298
50. Oliveira SF, Souza NJA, Araújo JMG, Lima S, Éllen R, Pinheiro JS, et al. Health education actions of nurses of the family health team in the assistance to the individual with systemic arterial hypertension: integrative review. Res Soc Dev. 2022;11:e142111233989. http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i12.33989
Submission: 25-Feb-2026
Approved: 13-Apr-2026
Editors:
Rosimere Ferreira Santana (ORCID: 0000-0002-4593-3715)
Geilsa Soraia Cavalcanti Valente (ORCID: 0000-0003-4488-4912)
Corresponding author: Emily da Silva Eberhardt (enfemilyeberhardt@gmail.com)
Publisher:
Escola de Enfermagem Aurora de Afonso Costa – UFF
Rua Dr. Celestino, 74 – Centro, CEP: 24020-091 – Niterói, RJ, Brazil
Journal email: objn.cme@id.uff.br
|
AUTHORSHIP CONTRIBUTIONS |
|
Study design: Eberhardt ES, Rosset I. Data collection: Eberhardt ES, Rosset I. Data analysis: Eberhardt ES, Morais EP, Fhon JRS, Rosset I. Data interpretation: Eberhardt ES, Morais EP, Fhon JRS, Rosset I. All authors are responsible for the textual writing and critical review of the intellectual content, the final version published, and all ethical, legal, and scientific aspects related to the accuracy and integrity of the study. |