ORIGINAL
Nurses' willingness to resort to Telemonitoring in users with chronic conditions: a cross-sectional study
Iven Giovanna Trindade Lino¹, Raquel Gusmão de Oliveira², Elen Ferraz Teston³, Patrícia Chatalov Ferreira¹, Verônica Francisqueti Marquete¹, Fernanda Carneiro Mussi⁴, Catia Suely Palmeira⁴, Sonia Silva Marcon¹
¹State University of Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil
²Cesumar University, Maringá, PR, Brazil
³Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil
⁴Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil
ABSTRACT
Objective: To verify Primary Care nurses' willingness to resort to Telemonitoring in the follow-up of users with arterial hypertension and/or diabetes mellitus. Method: A cross-sectional study conducted with nurses working in the municipalities from the 15th Health Region of Paraná. Of all the 289 individuals invited, 65 answered the online questionnaire made available in May and June 2021 via Google Forms. The nurses included were those working in the health units from the 15th Health Region and who answered the questionnaire sent. No exclusion criteria were adopted, even when a nurse left some questions unanswered. Chi-square, Fisher's Exact and Prevalence Ratio tests were used in the analysis. Results: An association was observed between less time since graduation and the perception that Telemonitoring without in-person assistance is insufficient to follow up the users; in addition, it was noticed that the Telemonitoring variables favor communication with the patients and can streamline the work performed by the team. More willingness to use Telemonitoring was perceived among those who underwent training. Conclusion: The absence of training sessions and the insufficiency of devices and human resources affect and may preclude Telemonitoring.
Descriptors: Primary Health Care; Nurses; Information and Communication Technologies; Chronic Condition.
INTRODUCTION
Primary Health Care (PHC) is the first health care level, and it is characterized by a set of actions at the individual and collective levels, which cover health promotion and protection, disease prevention, diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation, harm reduction and health maintenance(1). It is also responsible for providing integral, comprehensive and easily accessible care to the population for long periods, especially those diagnosed with Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases (CNCDs), ensuring referral and counter-referral and favoring health care continuity and integrality(1).
However, PHC faces challenges from poor planning and management of the Unified Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde, SUS), which has hindered controlling these conditions(2). Thus, despite the existence of public policies targeted at preventing risk factors, managing and treating chronic conditions, lack of control and hospitalizations due to Arterial Hypertension (AH) and/or Diabetes Mellitus (DM), among other conditions, they continue to occur and this points to the need to seek other health care strategies(3).
Among the new proposals for the care and management of chronic conditions, supported self-care and clinical management associated with the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs), stand out, both aimed at monitoring, educating and training people with CNCDs(4).
ICTs are technological resources used in different settings, but in the health area, their purpose is to seek and offer knowledge for the social demands of care and to favor dissemination and access to diverse information through computers and electronic communication networks, in addition to promoting remote interaction between the actors involved in the different social contexts(5).
The adoption of ICTs by the SUS represents an advance in implementing of policies targeted at expanding and improving healthcare practices(6). An important study that analyzed Telehealth in Brazil identified that the technology made it possible to qualify and increase care resoluteness, reduce distances and isolation between care levels and lower the number of referrals and inequities in health(7).
Telemonitoring stands out among the available ICTs, which consists of remotely monitoring individuals via telephone calls, not offering in-person assistance. Its use in health helps minimize barriers and enhance the interaction between the people involved in a quick and accessible way, favoring the implementation of the necessary care measures to preserve the patients' well-being(8). It is worth highlighting the contributions of the review that synthesized studies in the United Kingdom, identifying that this strategy enhances the management of long-term chronic health conditions such as AH, DM and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)(8).
In this sense, it is essential that health professionals and patients accept ICTs to ensure success in using technology in care. The perception of the tool's potential, the compatibility of this technology with clinical practices and its technological proficiency are intervening factors in its acceptance and use process(5).
In addition, the incorporation of ICTs in the work process requires involvement and effort on the part of professionals, and it is important to identify to what extent they are willing to use these technologies to organize and optimize routine care and even to guide patients and family members regarding use of these resources(9).
The role and influence of ICTs in everyday life and work processes have been explored in the literature, pointing out that managers recognize the importance of their implementation, although they need to prioritize their practical use(10). However, little is known about the professionals' perception regarding their use.
Thus, as there is still not enough data in the national territory on health professionals' willingness to use ICTs, not even on the human and structural resources that the services have for this use, the objective of this study was to verify Primary Care nurses' willingness to use Telemonitoring to follow-up users with arterial hypertension and/or diabetes mellitus.
METHOD
This is a cross-sectional study carried out within the scope of the 15thHealth Region (Regional de Saúde, RS) of Paraná, which comprises 30 municipalities and is headquartered in the city of Maringá. In order to write the report of the current study, the criteria established in Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE)(11) were used.
The sample under study was established for convenience upon invitation to all nurses (289) working in the Basic Health Units (BHUs) from all 30 municipalities belonging to the 15th RS. The data were collected in May and June 2021 through an electronic form made available in Google Forms.
To this end, the Permanent Education sector of the 15th RS sent a letter to the Primary Care coordinators in all municipalities, informing them about the research and requesting that the link to access the electronic form be sent to all PHC nurses. In that letter, 15 days were informed to fill in the form. Thirty days after the first submission, a new letter was sent to the coordinators asking them to remind the Primary Care nurses about the importance of collaborating with the research by filling out the form.
Although the Permanent Education sector sent the letter, the return rate was low. Nurses who worked at the BHUs from the 15th RS and answered the questionnaire were included in the study. No exclusion criteria were adopted, even when a nurse left some questions unanswered. Thus, the sample under study included 65 nurses who worked in 40 BHUs belonging to 24 municipalities and who filled out the electronic form.
The authors prepared the data collection form based on the study objective and improved it after a discussion with the matrix research coordinator's group members. It consists of four parts, but only three of them are considered in the current study, as the questions related to the perception and evaluation of how assistance to people with AH and/or DM was provided before the pandemic was not used.
a) Sociodemographic characterization: it included questions about gender, age, marital status, time since graduation, time working in PHC, specialty in the area of family health or public health;
b) Willingness to use Telemonitoring: it consisted of questions addressing individual willingness and perceptions about the viability and existence of human and structural resources. They had dichotomous answers (yes and no);
c) Knowledge and preconceptions about Telemonitoring use: comprised of answers arranged on a four-point Likert-type scale. In the analysis, the “I agree” and “I totally agree” options were dichotomized into “Yes” and “I disagree” and “I totally disagree” into “No”). The “Indifferent” option (“No opinion”) was not considered.
The data collected from all 65 interviewees were transcribed into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and converted to the IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) statistical program, version 25. Initially, the data were submitted to Exploratory Analysis (EA), where the absolute and relative frequencies of the categorical variables predicting the outcome of “willingness to use Telemonitoring in Primary Health Care” were verified, namely: a) Specialization in Family/Community Health; b) Using ICTs before the pandemic; c) Perceptions regarding ICT use: - It favors communication with other RAS points; - It enables monitoring of patients; - It streamlines/supports work; - It makes communication with the patient faster and easier; - It is unfeasible in the BHU; and d) Attitude: - I would like to receive training on Telemonitoring; - I would like to participate in a group with researchers to discuss the study experience and outcome. In the exploratory analysis, the hypothesis of normal distribution of the variables was also evaluated, which was rejected using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, as n>30.
In data analysis, the answers to the variables related to the perceptions about ICT use were dichotomized into “Yes” (“I totally agree” and “I partially agree”) and “No” (“I totally disagree” and “I partially disagree”), excluding the “I don't have an opinion” answers. Chi-square and Fisher's Exact tests were used to analyze the factors possibly associated with nurses' willingness to use Telemonitoring, the perception that this is insufficient if carried out without in-person assistance, and the perception that ICT use streamlines the work performed by the team. Finally, the unadjusted Prevalence Ratio (PR) was used as an association measure, accompanied by the respective confidence interval (95%). The variables that presented p<0.05 and the absence of the number 1 within the bivariate analysis’s PR confidence interval were considered possibly associated factors.
Development of the study respected all ethical precepts outlined in National Health Council resolutions 466/2012 and 510/2016 and the Guidelines for procedures in research studies with any stage in a virtual environment - CONEP/2021. The project was approved with Opinion number 4,505,345 by the signatory institution’s Committee of Ethics in Research with Human Beings. It is noted that access to filling out the data collection form was only available after reading the Free and Informed Consent Form and expressing consent to participate in the study.
RESULTS
All 65 nurses included in the study worked in 24 of the 30 municipalities belonging to the 15th RS, were aged between 24 and 56 years old, with a median of 36.0 (Interquartile Range = 35.14 -38.71), and were mostly female (86.2%) and married and/or in a stable union (68.8%). The time since graduation varied from 1 to 34 years, with a median of 9.0 (Interquartile Range = 7.81-11.48). More than half of the participants (52.3%) had worked in PHC for at least ten years, and 51.8% had no specialization in Family or Public Health (Table 1).
Table 1 - Sociodemographic characteristics of the nurses from the 15th Health region of Paraná (n=65). Maringá, PR, Brazil, 2023
n (%) |
||
Gender |
|
|
|
Female |
56 (86.2) |
|
Male |
9 (13.8) |
Age |
|
|
|
24-29 |
10 (15.5) |
|
30-39 |
35 (53.8) |
|
≥40 |
20 (30.7) |
Marital status |
||
|
Single |
16 (24.6) |
|
Married/Stable union |
45 (68.8) |
|
Divorced |
4 (6.2) |
Time since graduation |
|
|
|
1-5 years |
2 (3.1) |
|
6-10 years |
18 (27.7) |
|
11-15 years |
25 (38.5) |
|
16 -20 years |
17 (26.1) |
|
≥ 21 years |
3 (4.6) |
Specialization in Family and/or Public Health |
||
|
Yes |
30 (46.2) |
|
No |
35 (51.8) |
Time working in PHC |
||
|
1-5 years |
25 (38.4) |
|
6-10 years |
16 (24.6) |
|
11-15 years |
7 (10.8) |
|
16 -20 years |
14 (21.5) |
|
≥ 21 years |
3 (4.6) |
n: Absolute frequency; %: Relative Frequency |
Table 2 shows that, about professional training, most nurses had a specialization in Public or Family Health, did not participate in any training for ICT use, but had already used them in some way before the pandemic. Regarding the structure for Telemonitoring, most nurses reported that the units had Internet access, a computer, and a landline, but they needed a mobile phone or sufficient human resources.
As for the variables related to the perception of ICT use, most nurses considered that it was not feasible in their health unit; however, the majority also had a positive attitude towards them, as they believe that technology collaborates in the communication with other RAS points, that it streamlines and supports teamwork, makes communication with the patient faster and easier, and that it is possible to monitor patients using Telemonitoring.
Table 2 also shows that, in the analysis of the association with predictive variables, a higher prevalence of willingness to use Telemonitoring was verified among the professionals that had already undergone some training on ICTs and lower prevalence among those who reported that the Health Unit where they work has Internet, a computer and a landline. Although the prevalence of willingness to use Telemonitoring was higher among the professionals who believe that ICTs can collaborate with the dialogue between the RAS points and make communication with the patient faster and easier, the CI values do not support the conclusion that they would be factors associated with the event of interest.
Table 2 - Association between the existence of material resources in the BHU, professional training and perceptions about ICTs and nurses' willingness to use Telemonitoring in the follow-up of users with SAH and/or DM (n=65). Maringá, PR, Brazil, 2023
Variable |
Willingness to use Telemonitoring |
PR* |
CI(95%) |
p-value** |
|
Yes (%) |
No (%) |
||||
Already undergone some training in ICTs? |
|||||
Yes |
7 (100.00) |
0 (0.00) |
1.208 |
[1.074; 1.359] |
0.584 |
No |
48 (82.76) |
10 (17.24) |
1 |
- |
|
Does your BHU have Internet? |
|||||
Yes |
52 (83.87) |
10 (16.13) |
0.839 |
[0.752; 0.935] |
1.000 |
No |
3 (100.00) |
0 (0.00) |
1 |
|
|
Does your BHU have a computer? |
|||||
Yes |
52 (83.87) |
10 (16.13) |
0.839 |
[0.752; 0.935] |
1.000 |
No |
3 (100.00) |
0 (0.00) |
1 |
- |
|
Does your BHU have a landline? |
|||||
Yes |
49 (83.05) |
10 (16.95) |
0.831 |
[0.740; 0.932] |
0.579 |
No |
6 (100.00) |
0 (0.00) |
1 |
- |
|
Does your BHU have a mobile phone? |
|||||
Yes |
18 (81.82) |
4 (18.18) |
0.951 |
[0.755; 1.198] |
0.723 |
No |
37 (86.00) |
6 (14.0) |
1 |
- |
|
Does your BHU have enough HRs? |
|||||
Yes |
26 (86.67) |
4 (13.33) |
1.050 |
[0.851; 1.285] |
0.471 |
No |
29 (82.90) |
6 (17.10) |
1 |
- |
|
Do you have any specialization in Public and/or Family Health? |
|||||
Yes |
25 (83.33) |
5 (16.67) |
0.972 |
[0.788; 1.199] |
0.529 |
No |
30 (85.71) |
5 (14.29) |
1 |
- |
|
Were ICTs already used in your BHU before the pandemic? |
|||||
Yes |
29 (85.29) |
5 (14.71) |
1.017 |
[0.826; 1.252] |
1.000 |
No |
26 (83.87) |
5 (16.13) |
1 |
- |
|
Does ICT use favor communication with other RAS points? |
|||||
Yes |
46 (90.20) |
5 (9.80) |
1.403 |
[0.940; 2.095] |
0.031 |
No |
9 (64.29) |
5 (35.71) |
1 |
- |
|
Is it possible to monitor a patient by using the phone? |
|||||
Yes |
45 (86.54) |
7 (13.46) |
1.125 |
[0.820; 1.544] |
0.405 |
No |
10 (76.92) |
3 (23.08) |
1 |
- |
|
Does Telemonitoring streamline/support work? |
|||||
Yes |
50 (87.72) |
7 (12.28) |
1.535 |
[0.802; 2.937] |
0.070 |
No |
4 (66.67) |
2 (33.33) |
1 |
- |
|
Does ICT use favor communication with the patient (turning it faster and easier)? |
|||||
Yes |
48 (87.50) |
7 (12.50) |
1.750 |
[0.781; 3.919] |
0.048 |
No |
3 (50.00) |
3 (50.00) |
1 |
- |
|
Is ICT use feasible in your BHU (n=64)? |
|||||
Yes |
16 (76.19) |
5 (23.81) |
0.862 |
[0.663; 1.121] |
0.275 |
No |
38 (88.37) |
5 (11.63) |
1 |
- |
|
Note: * = Prevalence Ratio; ** = Fisher's Exact test. |
Table 3 shows that age (less than 30 years old) and time since graduation (less than 10 years) were factors with a suggestive association with the perception that Telemonitoring without in-person assistance is insufficient to follow-up users with AH and/or DM. Regarding the perception that ICT use streamlines the work performed by the team, there was an association between a reference to the possibility of follow-up using ICTs and the perception that communication with the patient becomes faster and easier. Although significance was observed for the time since graduation, the PR CI value does not reinforce the result.
Table 3 – Prevalence Ratio (PR) between the predictive variables of interest and the “Telemonitoring without in-person assistance is insufficient” and “Telemonitoring streamlines the work performed by the team” outcomes, according to nurses from the 15th Health Region (n=65). Maringá, PR, Brazil, 2023
Predictive variables |
Outcomes |
|||||||
Telemonitoring without in-person assistance is possible |
It streamlines the work performed by the team |
|||||||
Yes |
No |
PR [95% CI]* |
p-value |
Yes |
No |
PR [95% CI]* |
p-value |
|
Age |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 30 years old |
7 (70.0) |
3 (30.0) |
2.022 [1.165;3.510] |
0.037** |
7 (70.0) |
3 (30.0) |
0.756 [0.500;1.142] |
0.070** |
30+ years old |
18 (34.6) |
34 (65.4) |
1 |
|
50 (92.6) |
4 (7.4) |
1 |
|
Time working in PHC |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Less than 10 years |
13 (54.2) |
11 (45.8) |
1.715 [0.946;3.111] |
0.077# |
23 (92.0) |
2 (8.0) |
1.055 [0.893;1.247] |
0.695** |
10+ years |
12 (31.6) |
26 (68.4) |
1 |
34 (87.2) |
5 (12.8) |
1 |
||
Time since graduation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Less than 10 years |
9 (64.3) |
5 (35.7) |
1.929 [1.103;3.373] |
0.038# |
10 (71.4) |
4 (28.6) |
0.760 [0.542;1.066] |
0.036** |
10+ years |
16 (33.3) |
32 (66.7) |
|
47 (94.0) |
3 (6.0) |
1 |
||
Monitoring is possible |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Yes |
19 (38.8) |
30 (61.2) |
0.840 [0.424;1.666] |
0.630# |
51 (98.1) |
1 (1.9) |
1.962 [1.113;3.458] |
<0.001** |
No/Insufficient |
6 (46.2) |
7 (53.8) |
1 |
6 (50.0) |
6 (50.0) |
1 |
|
|
It favors communication with the patient |
|
|
|
|
||||
Yes |
20 (37.7) |
33 (62.3) |
0.566 [0.292;1.099] |
56 (100.0) |
0 (0.00) |
- |
<0.001** |
|
No |
4 (66.7) |
2 (33.3) |
1 |
0 (0.00) |
6 (100.0) |
- |
|
* PR – Prevalence Ratio; 95% CI - 95% Confidence Interval;
** Fisher's Exact test
# Chi-square test.
DISCUSSION
The advancement of ICTs has accelerated the implementation of policies to expand and improve their incorporation into care, management, and educational practices. An example of this was the rapid inclusion and adaptation of technologies in the work process during the social isolation period caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, especially within the PHC scope, which had to rethink how to provide care to people prevented from attending health units(11).
The contribution of ICTs to management has impacted on healthcare efficiency, effectiveness, and safety, as they are considered technical means that help process information and ease communication. The incorporation of these resources has been recorded in countries such as China, the United States, and Brazil, and there is diverse evidence of the association between using these technologies and improvements in the quality of the care provided in health services. However, this relationship is not observed in all realities, given the many difficulties faced by health services. In addition, the attitudes toward using these work resources are still poorly understood and evaluated(12).
Regarding these aspects, it is important to consider that almost half of the nurses studied did not receive any training related to ICT use. A research study that analyzed ICT use by nurses from 2013 to 2016 based on secondary data obtained from the TIC Saúde database observed that nearly 75% of them had not attended training sessions or courses on the subject matter in the last 12 months(10).
Concerning Nursing care management in PHC, the incorporation of ICTs emerges as an ancillary resource, as it contributes to improving management, expanding professional-patient intercommunication and favoring knowledge production(13). Among the possibilities offered by ICTs, the following stand out: ease in recording information; more integrated workflows, connecting the various activities carried out in management; information storage and easy access to data; use of technological resources for time management; and speed in responses and decision-making, exerting a direct impact on patient safety(14).
In this context, a study carried out in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Germany with patients with chronic heart failure pointed out the cost-effectiveness of Home-based Telemonitoring resulting from telephone Nursing support, in addition to the more remarkable survival of these patients when compared to those who only received usual care(15).
Despite all this evidence related to the benefits of using ICTs in health management and care, the current study found that a high percentage of nurses considered their use unfeasible in the health unit where they worked and did not perceive their various benefits. These results deserve reflection and raise the need to explore what leads nurses to have unfavorable perceptions, given that these can negatively impact on the use of Telemonitoring to follow-up users with AH and/or DM.
It is noted that the process of incorporating ICTs into the health professionals' routine depends on some factors, such as familiarity and skill with the technologies, the professionals' positive assessment of the potential of this resource for health care qualification, the existence of adequate infrastructure, the institutions' funding to adopt the technology, and credibility and trust in the technology by users and professionals(2).
Regarding these aspects, in addition to the majority of nurses in the current study not realizing the potential of ICTs in qualifying the care provided to the users, most of them also highlighted the lack of adequate resources for their implementation, such as the unavailability of mobile phone devices. In addition, a significant percentage of nurses mentioned insufficiency of human resources. These data reveal that basic health units must be better supported with structural and human resources and, therefore, financial ones, to effectively enable Nursing Telemonitoring for users with AH and/or DM.
According to the TIC Saúde database, the lack of team training and the absence of financial resources to invest in technologies frequently interfered with ICT use, which might be hindering or demotivating factors(10). In the literature, other barriers to ICT use are mentioned as financial challenges, technical complexities, and problems related to communication by health services and users(16). However, a study that analyzed 29,756 health teams (66.2% of the total number of Primary Care teams existing in Brazil in 2013) drew attention to the need for a careful analysis between the influence of service structure and the real difficulty of ICT use, as structural variables (Internet, physical structure of the service and type of health unit) were not significantly associated. In addition, it considered that the results might be under the effect of residual confounding(17).
In the case of the current study, even though less willingness to use Telemonitoring was identified among the nurses who reported that the Health Unit where they worked had Internet, a computer, and a landline, it should be remembered that the data were collected in the first months of the pandemic when the need for access to technology was intensified. This allowed nurses to perceive that if the resources available in the unit (human and technological) needed improvement, it would be very tough to implement this strategy in their care routine.
In the current study, being younger and having less time since graduation was suggestively associated with the perception that Telemonitoring without in-person assistance is insufficient for follow-up users. Telemonitoring should be part of an integrated healthcare system, not to replace but to improve and expand existing care services and access to appropriate use and efficiency of health services(18).
Nurses believe that using this resource can streamline the work performed by the team, in addition to easing communication with the users. Corroborating this, the 19 nurses participating in a study carried out in Rio de Janeiro pointed out that ICTs assisted in a positive way in the organization of activities and agility of the communication process between the team and the assisted users(5). A study in Canada also found a positive perception of nurses regarding Telemonitoring to follow-up people with CNCDs. In addition, the users accepted and adopted Telemonitoring at a moderate to high adherence level in all conditions, envisioning this technology as supporting patient self-care, keeping them connected to the clinical team and improving communication and teamwork(19). In the same direction, a study that investigated the effectiveness of clinical management using of Telemonitoring in southern Brazil with 109 individuals with chronic conditions, all monitored by the supplementary health system, found a significant improvement in the adoption and/or maintenance of healthy habits, in addition to highlighting the low cost for its use(14).
The nurses participating in the current study believed that Telemonitoring could also favor communication between the different points of the Health Care Network (Rede de Atenção à Saúde, RAS). In line with this result, a scoping review that included 10 studies, four of which were carried out in Brazil, highlighted the little relevance attributed to ICTs as a means to facilitate the satisfactory performance of the RAS, although this constitutes an important strategy for coordination and regulation in health(20). The lack of mobile phones, and insufficient human resources reported by the nurses in the current study as factors that may compromise the implementation of Telemonitoring confirm the results of a study carried out in Espírito Santo(2). At that time, it was found that the use rates of technologies by health professionals were lower than expected, which led the authors to consider that the current PHC setting is marked by structural precariousness, work overload and insufficient computerization, which impairs acceptance and use of technologies(2). In this way, they pointed out the need for investments in structuring health services and adapting technologies to the professionals' reality, as well as in actions that promote greater proximity of all with technologies(2).
Regarding these aspects, a study carried out in the state of Minas Gerais pointed out that health professionals made little use of the structure of the services, opting for their means, such as smartphones and home computers(7), which was probably related to the non-existence or even precariousness of the equipment available in the work environment. However, even if this occurs in an incipient way and without institutional support, it is still considered a step forward in the attempt to introduce ICTs into the work practice.
Higher prevalence was verified in the willingness to use Telemonitoring among the professionals already training in ICTs. In this direction, a study in Scotland pointed out that to implement Telemonitoring in health services, it is important not only the support of institutions and available structural resources but also to implement strategies that train professionals to use them(21). These results confirm what was found in the study in Rio de Janeiro, which pointed out that resorting to permanent health education contributes to the PHC professionals' sensitization regarding the use of the technology(5). In other words, for Telemonitoring use to be viable in everyday work, the professionals need to be adequately prepared and, at the same time, have sufficient structural and human resources(2).
It is noted that the actions to expand Telemonitoring use in Brazil, mainly within the SUS scope, are still timid despite the benefits already reported(14). Many of these actions have arisen from public notices to promote research, allowing the acquisition of infrastructure, equipment, and the formation of research centers in several academic institutions in the country. Regarding public policies, the Brasil Redes National Telehealth Program was developed in Brazil and launched in 2007, which aimed at improving the quality of the assistance and Basic Care in the SUS, integrating teaching and service through information technology tools, in addition to providing permanent education for health professionals(17).
However, it is important to highlight that although initiatives aimed at encouraging ICT use in the SUS are still scarce, supplementary network clinical management employing Telemonitoring for beneficiaries with chronic conditions is already a reality in some health plan operators(14). This fact allows inferring that Telemonitoring in the follow-up of beneficiaries with chronic conditions is, at least, rewarding in monetary terms. Thus, it is crucial to reinforce the importance of the SUS not measuring efforts to implement and value the use of this care strategy, which also implies working with nurses so that they can reflect on their perceptions and understanding of the theme.
A study on the challenges and opportunities of using Telemonitoring in the SUS highlighted the potential benefit of this technology for a significant reduction in costs with the management of CNCDs, and asserted that the challenge of its incorporation into health services is related to the scarcity of studies specifically focused on Telemonitoring(22).
Planning and evaluation are required to incorporate technologies into health services. Thus, to implement Telemonitoring in the service, it is necessary to recognize the importance of sensitizing and training the professionals through specific training, in addition to providing material and human resources and technical support for using the technology in managing chronic conditions.
th Health Region. In any case, the results are valid because they allow identifying the factors that lead nurses to not wanting to incorporate Telemonitoring into their care practice and to know the aspects that, in their opinion, would ease the change in their willingness to use the technology in their work routine.
CONCLUSION
Most of the nurses pointed out the scarcity of structural and human resources in basic health units for ICT use; they did not consider their implementation feasible, although they believed that their use could favor communication with other RAS points and with the patient, that they streamline and support teamwork, and that it is possible to follow-up patients with AH and/or DM using Telemonitoring. A higher prevalence of willingness to use Telemonitoring was found among the professionals who had already received some training in ICTs and a lower prevalence among those who reported that the Health Unit where they work had Internet, a computer, and a landline. Being less than 30 years old and having graduated less than 10 years ago were associated with the perception that Telemonitoring without in-person assistance is insufficient to follow-up users and that the Telemonitoring variables favor communication with the patient and can streamline the team’s work.
The absence of training sessions and the insufficiency of devices and human resources affect and may preclude Telemonitoring. Thus, it is up to the managers to develop and implement policies that can improve the structure, make human resources available and offer permanent education aimed at training professionals to make nurses aware of the benefits offered by the technology and its incorporation into their everyday work practice.
The authors have declared that there is no conflict of interests.
FUNDING
This work was carried out with the support of the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel – Brazil (CAPES). Finance Code 001.
1. Paula EA de, Schwartz E, Nunes BP, Santos BP dos Barceló A. Institutional capacity for the care of people with chronic diseases in primary health care. Rev Eletr Enferm. 2022 24:68990. https://doi.org/10.5216/ree.v24.68990
2. Sarti TD, Andreão RV, de Souza CB, Schimidt MQ, Celestrini JR. O serviço de teleconsultoria assíncrona na APS: avaliação de uso e fatores associados do Programa Telessaúde Espírito Santo entre 2012 e 2015. Rev Bras Med Fam Comunid. 2019;14(41):2068. https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc14(41)2068
3. Ferreira PC, Teston EF, Marquete VF, Santos RMS, Rossi RM, Marcon SS. Use of urgency and emergency services for acute hypertension and/or diabetes complications. Ecs Anna Nery. 2021;15(2):599-615. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-9465-EAN-2021-0003
4. Unda Villafuerte F, Llobera Canaves J, Lorente Montalvo P, Sancho MLM, Oliver BO, Flores BP, et al. Effectiveness of a multifactorial intervention, consisting of self-management of antihypertensive medication, self-measurement of blood pressure, hypocaloric and low sodium diet, and physical exercise, in patients with uncontrolled hypertension taking 2 or more antihypertensive drugs. Medicina (Baltimore). 2020;99(17):e19769. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019769
5. Costa LS, Silva IR, Silva TP, Silva MM, Mendes IAC, Ventura CAA. Information and communication technologies: interfaces of the nursing work process. Rev Bras Enferm. 2022 75(2):e20201280. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2020-1280
6. Silva WNS, Silva KCS, Araújo AA, Barros MBSC, Monteiro EMLM, Bushatsky M, et al. Technologies in the empowerment process of primary nursing care in the covid-19 context. Cienc Cuid Saúde. 2022;21. https://doi.org/10.4025/ciencuidsaude.v21i0.58837
7. Damasceno RF, Caldeira AP. Fatores associados à não utilização da teleconsultoria por médicos da Estratégia Saúde da Família. Cienc Saúde Colet. 2019;24:3089-98. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018248.28752017
8. Hanley J, Pinnock H, Paterson M, McKinstry B. Implementing telemonitoring in primary care: learning from a large qualitative dataset gathered during a series of studies. BMC FamPract. 2018;19(1):118. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0814-6
9. Azavedo SL, Oliveira ASFR, Parente JS, Cunha MAL, Mour MLC, Lima ALO, et al. A tecnologia de informação e comunicação em saúde: Vivências e práticas educativas no Programa HIPERDIA. Braz J Dev 2021;7(3). https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv7n3-591
10. Machado M, Paz A, Linch GFC. Uso das tecnologias de informação e comunicação em saúde pelos enfermeiros brasileiros. Enferm Foco 2019;10(5):91-96. https://doi.org/10.21675/2357-707X.2019.v10.n5.2543
11. Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335(7624):806-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD
12. Martin BD, Barnhart E, Gillis J Jr, Vazquez GA. Primary Care Population Management for COVID-19 Patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(10):3077-3080. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0814-6
13. Martins MMFPS, Trindade LL, Vandresen L, Leite MJMGC, Pereira CMG. Tecnologias utilizadas por enfermeiros gestores em hospitais portugueses. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2020;41:e20190294. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-%201447.2020.20190294
14. Fernandes BCG, Silva Júnior JNB, Guedes HCS, Macedo DBG, Nogueira MF, Barrêto AJR. Use of technologies by nurses in the management of primary health care. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2021;42:e20200197. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2021.20200197
15. Vandresen L, Pires DEP, Martins MMFPS, Forte ECN, Leão E, Mendes M. Potencialidades e dificuldadesda mediação tecnológica no trabalho de enfermeiros gestores em hospitais. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2022;31:e20220173. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-265X-TCE-2022-0173pt
16. Grustam AS, Severens JL, De Massari D, Buyukkaramikli N, Koymans R, Vrijhoef HJM. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Telehealth: A Comparison between Home Telemonitoring, Nurse Telephone Support, and Usual Care in Chronic Heart Failure Management. Value Health. 2018; 21(7):772-782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2017.11.011
17. Zaman SB, Khan RK, Evans RG, Thrift AG, Maddison R, Islam SMS. Exploring Barriers to and Enablers of the Adoption of Information and Communication Technology for the Care of Older Adults With Chronic Diseases: Scoping Review. JMIR Aging. 2022;5(1):e25251. https://doi.org/10.2196%2F25251
18. Sarti TD, Almeida APS. Incorporation of telehealth in primary health care and associated factors in Brazil. Cad. Saúde Pública. 2022;38(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311XPT252221
19. Kouskoukis MN, Botsaris C. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Telemedicine Systems/Units in Greek Remote Areas. Pharmacoecon Open. 2017;1(2):117-121. https://0.1007/s41669-016-0006-z
20. Gordon K, Dainty KN, Steele Gray C, DeLacy J, Shah A, Resnick M, Seto E. Experiences of Complex Patients With Telemonitoring in a Nurse-Led Model of Care: Multimethod Feasibility Study. JMIR Nurs. 2020;3(1):e22118. https://doi.org/10.2196/22118
21. Nakata, LC, Feltrin AFS, Chaves LDP, Ferreira JBF. Concept of health care network and its key characteristics: a scoping review. Ecs Anna Nery. 2020;24(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-9465-EAN-2019-0154
22. Hammersley V, Parker R, Paterson M et al. Telemonitoring at scale for hypertension in primary care: An implementation study. PLoS Med. 2020;16(6). https://10.0.5.91/journal.pmed.1003124
23. Paula, AC; Maldonado, JMSV; Gadelha, CAG. Health care telemonitoring and business dynamics: challenges and opportunities for SUS. Rev Saúde Pública. 2020;54:65. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001996
Submission: 10/21/2022
Approved: 06/19/2023
AUTHORSHIP CONTRIBUTIONS |
Project design: Lino IGT, Marcon SS Data collection: Lino IGT Data analysis and interpretation: Lino IGT, Mussi FC, Palmeira CS, Marcon SS Writing and/or critical review of the intellectual content: Lino IGT, Teston EF, Ferreira PC, Marquete VF, Mussi FC, Palmeira CS, Marcon SS Final approval of the version to be published: Lino IGT, Oliveira RG, Marcon SS Responsibility for the text in ensuring the accuracy and completeness of any part of the paper: Lino IGT, Oliveira RG, Teston EF, Ferreira PC, Marquete VF, Mussi FC, Palmeira CS, Marcon SS
|